You need therapy for being so reflexively servile that you expect others to behave as obsequiously.
Name the great QB Parcells drafted or groomed? I can review Parcells QB selections from Phil Simms to Hostetler to Bledsoe to Romo without ad hominem. Can you? Doubtful.
Now...try not to be lame and worship at Parcells' alter...and give me a reply that is on subject.
Notice how no one engages with me on the issue of losing the locker room or wasting other star players careers looking for a QB.
These are things legit GM's have to deal with.
All the talk of "we could have had the same results(not winning a SB) if we had a guy on a rookie deal" isnt how this works in real life(assuming this is real).
No one wants to talk about those two very real issues the real GM's have to deal with.
Then add into it that all the same negative posters focus on team stats to define a player and hate on them...real GM's couldnt do that.
Dak's salary demands are frustrating...but every team has the same issue if they want a good vet QB and all teams have the same math tricks.
Personally...I only let Dak go if he and his agent are being selfish. Im not low balling him, though. The talk about cut vet QB's for rookies is just ingredients for losing a locker room unless everyone inside the locker room thinks the player has glaring issues. I dont think Dak's "yips" are real but more designed and I dont think Dak's lack of reading defenses is as bad as is suggested.
Maybe Kurt Warner or some other QB scout needs to break down every single Dak Playoff game and tell us how slow he was or what bad decisions he made routinely. I will take Dak's reg season stats and low turnovers and ask the other facets of the team, including coaching, to pull some weight....while also hoping Dak is reasonable in contract negotiations.
Im all for moving on from Dak if consultants, scouts and coaches say he has flaws and he and his agent are being unreasonable.