Stash
Staff member
- Messages
- 78,835
- Reaction score
- 103,565
firehawk350;1541378 said:The answer is 42.
Crap!
I guessed 34 in the office pool. Guess I'm out that $5.00
Oh well, thanks for the effort!
firehawk350;1541378 said:The answer is 42.
While I was an English Major and graduated with Honors, I have to confess something to you regarding this response.firehawk350;1541343 said:I'm intelligence by trade, I derive a certain pleasure in studying people I dislike. But I do enjoy good football and the only times I enjoy a Cowboys victory is when they beat somebody who would have taken the Skins playoff spot or when they play against the Eagles (hate their fans, they are the only ones I find consistently classless) or the Patriots (stupid media darlings). I hate them both far more.
firehawk350;1541326 said:In an effort to find middle ground and settle the debate that is raging in like 8 different threads, here's my offer to you.
Hostile;1541382 said:You see, I'm a football junkie and I love to argue. I know that will shock you right down to your very soul to hear me admit that, but it's true. I'll argue stuff I don't even believe in just for the giggle factor of it.
firehawk350;1541368 said:It sounds more daunting then it is. All it takes is about an hour after the game with a notepad and a remote. Tallying it will be some time at the end of the season, but it's considerably less then I have spent so far talking about this.
41gy#;1541392 said:You need the coaches' game film to grade film, and you are not a coach.
Plus, you are a Commanders fan.
TV footage + Commander fan= not valid
Go get 'em!
Maybe you can meet up with Brian Stewart.
cobra;1541394 said:At the end, if your point is proven, does your team get 2 more Lombardi's?
41gy#;1541375 said:If I was you, I would go back and look at LeRon Landry, because Brandon Meriweather and Reggie Nelson are much better cover safties than Landry.
LeRon Landry is fast, but he had coverage issues at LSU. Taylor can't cover Glenn or Owens in your cover-3 packages.
41gy#;1541375 said:You better hope your blitzes work, because your ends don't scare anyone. Your DTs are weak.
41gy#;1541375 said:How are you going to generate points if Phillips sicks Newman on Santa Moss? Is that why you fear him and want to discredit him.
41gy#;1541375 said:Dallas has proven they can take care of your running game which lost one of its best guards. Who is gong to replace Dockery? It sure didn't come through the draft.
41gy#;1541375 said:You make it sound like Champ Bailey sucked in Washington when he was highly regarded there. Danny Boy just wanted to spend his money elsewhere.
Now Bailey is touted the best in the league. That wasn't a smart move, especially since Portis is showing signs of breaking down.
41gy#;1541392 said:You need the coaches' game film to grade film, and you are not a coach.
Plus, you are a Commanders fan.
TV footage + Commander fan= not valid
Go get 'em!
Maybe you can meet up with Brian Stewart.
firehawk350;1541362 said:Actually, I was planning on doing this for Romo, Jones, Barber, Witten and Roy Williams on the Boys side (maybe not so much detail) and Campbell, Portis, Betts, Moss, Lloyd/Randle El, Cooley, Taylor and Rogers anyways, just to settle a couple of questions/concerns I have in my own mind.
cobra;1541394 said:At the end, if your point is proven, does your team get 2 more Lombardi's?
5-3
burmafrd;1541408 said:Dockery was your worst lineman? Now you have totally lost what little credibility you had.
firehawk350;1541405 said:In the end, if the Cowboys win the super bowl and go 16-0 and never let a opponent gain a yard, do you get money, or a girl, or a car or something for supporting them???
superpunk;1541404 said:If you want to undertake this - go for it. I think it's a great idea. But there's no need to go making a huge deal out of it - the "Firehawk Newman Challenge" nonsense. By all means, chart these players and their performance in games. I have no doubt you'll quickly see how superior the Cowboys players are, in almost everyone of the cases you cited. Your numbers won't be perfect, but as long as you remain consistent, and apply the same criteria across the board - IF you follow through on this, you should have some pretty good indicators of what you've seen.
superpunk;1541404 said:My suggestions?
Set your criteria now. If you're going to attribute catches to a certain player, or decide that a QB made a good decision with the ball even if the receiver didn't catch it - set the criteria up before the season, so noone can come crap on your evaluations. Get some video capture software and provide examples for people. If you do a good enough - unbiased job, people might even start looking for your stuff.
superpunk;1541404 said:Understand though - that nothing you are planning on doing has any bearing on that other thread, which you were being hopelessly ridiculous in.
Understand also - if you plan on really charting Sean Taylor this year - prepare for depression. Because it's a damn shame such a talented player sucks so hard.
cobra;1541419 said:I get the joy of knowing that my team is the most dominant football team in the league, instead of some second tier team like the Skins.
But no money, girls or cars. You're right about that.
"This doesn't mean we'll be swappin' spit in the showers."nyc;1541390 said:Wow, we have something in common besides Cowboys Football.