blueblood70
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 42,018
- Reaction score
- 28,631
This is what I've been trying to say I think that the only way to prove this is somehow get a time machine and bring back all of them in their prime and bring them onto a field that's set up with a bunch of targets with actual pressure sensors at different and varying yardages and then also have them launch from a standing still and one from a moving forward position and then see how it all works out scientifically there is no other way to prove it people's eyes cannot remember nor compare unless they're all on the field at the same time in their primes people here claim they know because they seen them all I'm sorry what you might be seeing on the field as a stronger arm it's just your eyes because that's what you remember that doesn't make it a stronger arm... Just about all our starting quarterbacks in the NFL real true starters have a strong enough arm to make every throw some are a little stronger than others it doesn't matter but there's a reason Cooper rush is a backup because he doesn't have a strong arm at all he is a **** dunker that occasionally could put some air under one to make it deep but anyone who thinks Prescott doesn't have a strong arm or Romo I I don't get it like how you gonna prove it prove itThe problem with questions like this is it’s a different eras. Today’s professional athletes are so far physically superior to athletes of the 60s and 70s. You really can’t even compare the two. And that’s not taking away anything from those back then it’s just how it is. As far as just raw arm strength? That definitely would’ve been Aikman. Romo really didn’t have tremendous arm spring three had a very quick release and had an unknown human likability to buy himself extra time in the pocket with excellent pocket presence and the ability to make quick reads. Prescott really doesn’t have that strong of an arm either.
scientifically prove it