Bizwah
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 8,157
- Reaction score
- 3,877
You missed the point of my post....I think......I was saying that if you can talk about unproven players as improvements, then we can too.
True....but then, could Peterman possibly be an improvement over the "LA" of last year?
There's no question that he's no Allen in Allen's prime. I'm not going to say that.
But it's a possible improvement over what we had last year.
Actually, I was pointing out the inconsistency of your posts. Sure, you have two CBs with experience, but they're far from proven.
And I disagree with the first rounder post thingy...There are many first round busts. Until McDougle, Andrews, and Green (?I think?) prove it on the field, then they're question marks.
I agree that he's an overrated receiver. But to say he's no better than what we had last year is wishful thinking on your part.
What were we missing with our WR corps last year? Answer: Toughness..a Possession receiver.....size....attitude... Does Key provide these things? Yes. Do we still have plenty of speed to burn at WR without JG? Yes..
So improvement at WR....
Again, this is what I was pointing out about you.....I was merely trying to state that we can say the same thing about your young players.
That's just fine....I'm not bragging about our QB situation. This is the position that separates our two teams.
But Henson is our future.....I'm excited about what he can be.
I disagree....But even if you don't think we're the best in the league (in spite of all the evidence that contradicts you), you have to admit we're one of the best.
I'm wagering he can.......But of course, he's a major upgrade anyway you look at it. His two sacks last year were still double what we got from Ek.
Not true.....most here will admit that Hunter has great potential. We're just wary of whether or not he'll fulfill it.
Again.....the jist of my post was to point out your inconsistenies.
You come over here trying to shove our "holes" in our faces and crow how yours were all filled. But by pointing out how you filled some of your "holes" with unproven players, you showed inconsistency.
I admit that we have tons of questions. We have tried to plug these "holes" with rookies and unproven players. RB, OL, LB, CB....all areas have unproven players attempting to fill holes.
This is no different from your team....you have "holes" on your team that you're attempting to fill with unprovens.
For every Sheppard you point to.....I can point to a Hunter that is bigger, stronger, and faster. For every McDougle or Brown you point to as filling your "holes" I'll point to a Jones, or a Rogers, or a Peterman.
With unproven players like these, how can you know if your "holes" have been filled better than ours?
AJM1613 said:I don't think that you can say that yet. I'm not saying that they don't have potential but they are 2nd and 3rd round rookies, not exactly a major improvement over the best guard of all time.
True....but then, could Peterman possibly be an improvement over the "LA" of last year?
There's no question that he's no Allen in Allen's prime. I'm not going to say that.
But it's a possible improvement over what we had last year.
Again you are implying that these guys will be good. Something you can't say until they play at least one game.
Actually, I was pointing out the inconsistency of your posts. Sure, you have two CBs with experience, but they're far from proven.
And I disagree with the first rounder post thingy...There are many first round busts. Until McDougle, Andrews, and Green (?I think?) prove it on the field, then they're question marks.
I don't exactly agree with this. I think he is the most overrated reciever of all time and I have been saying that for a while now, not just because he is on the Cowboys. He realy is no better than what you had last year. That is just my opinion though.
I agree that he's an overrated receiver. But to say he's no better than what we had last year is wishful thinking on your part.
What were we missing with our WR corps last year? Answer: Toughness..a Possession receiver.....size....attitude... Does Key provide these things? Yes. Do we still have plenty of speed to burn at WR without JG? Yes..
So improvement at WR....
I agree that he will be an upgrade but again, everything you say is just assuming that these rookies will produce a lot their rookie year.
Again, this is what I was pointing out about you.....I was merely trying to state that we can say the same thing about your young players.
I'm not going to coment on this...
That's just fine....I'm not bragging about our QB situation. This is the position that separates our two teams.
But Henson is our future.....I'm excited about what he can be.
Your defense isn't bad, just not the best in the league.
I disagree....But even if you don't think we're the best in the league (in spite of all the evidence that contradicts you), you have to admit we're one of the best.
Hopefully he can improve on his 3 sacks last year...or 6 from the year before.
I'm wagering he can.......But of course, he's a major upgrade anyway you look at it. His two sacks last year were still double what we got from Ek.
Good secondary but I haven't realy heard anything good about Hunter, even on this site!
Not true.....most here will admit that Hunter has great potential. We're just wary of whether or not he'll fulfill it.
Again.....the jist of my post was to point out your inconsistenies.
You come over here trying to shove our "holes" in our faces and crow how yours were all filled. But by pointing out how you filled some of your "holes" with unproven players, you showed inconsistency.
I admit that we have tons of questions. We have tried to plug these "holes" with rookies and unproven players. RB, OL, LB, CB....all areas have unproven players attempting to fill holes.
This is no different from your team....you have "holes" on your team that you're attempting to fill with unprovens.
For every Sheppard you point to.....I can point to a Hunter that is bigger, stronger, and faster. For every McDougle or Brown you point to as filling your "holes" I'll point to a Jones, or a Rogers, or a Peterman.
With unproven players like these, how can you know if your "holes" have been filled better than ours?