That would depend on what kind of run game we could put out there. With last years run productivity, i wouldn't feel great about it. I think with a very good run game he could succeed with a game plan based on RPO's and lots of rollout designed plays. Wouldn't expect him to throw for 300 yards. I think he'll get better, but based on where he appears to be today, that would be my thinking.
Possibly. With the starters he will have better protection, meaning more time to throw. And Lamb and Cooks can get open a lot better than guys like Racy McMath and Jalen Cropper.
I would feel bad that Dak and Rush were injured to the point of being unable to play and wonder who our backup is now.
Blimey! As horrible as Lance would be, it would be a franchise re-shuffling and a step in the right direction. With Lance we go 5-12.
Played with backups against backups!
Unfortunately I think Giants and Washington are too bad to beat even with a low end backup at QB. That means you are probably not drafting top and more likely 8 or 9 which is unfortunate when you need the most important position.
The Raiders played their starters for a good portion of the game.
Does not fit their narrative or agenda. They are in fear.
The TV only said it every two minutes. What do you want from him?
You obviously make no money in Vegas because you have no idea that there is an actual point spread involved in every game
he is an average QB, with accuracy issues. he will compensate for some of that with his running ability. absolute best case scenario (actually worst) if he plays to the best of his abilities would be about 7 to 8 wins. which would put us in the middle of first round. actual best case scenario would for us to win 3, or 4 games and have a top 5 pick.
fat chance. but miracles do happen. so it would be a total miracleWhat if Trey starts against SF ... and wins ...
so you go through garbage bin and find a half eaten chicken and can legit claim its the best food in there. being the best of bunch of garbage is still garbage.
