I’d trade for Stafford in a heart beat

baltcowboy said:
The Football Team needs a young stud that is cheap so they can pay that defense in the future. Stafford could get them to the divisional round but then he will get exposed. They need to find away to get Wilson, Fields, and Lance. It sounds crazy but after a some trades there is a possibility 4 of the top 5 picks is a quarterback.
Click to expand...

That's just it, picking 19 means all the top QBs will be gone. Not to mention, I'm sure Rivera wanna fool with a rookie. I think he feels his team is ready now. Also that fact they just Mayhew, who drafted Stafford, doesn't hurt at all. I can see them offering 19, their 3rd, and maybe 2022 pick. Of course, I could be wrong, so we'll see.
 
BobbyFlame469 said:
Caldwell won a SUPERBOWL with Joe flacco. He’s a great coach....

since he left Joe never made the playoffs. Stratford had his chances
Click to expand...

That was a team carried by Ray Lewis and the defense but Flacco played great that postseason as well. There are many. teams over the years who have won with dominating defense. The Tampa team in 2003........the Bronco team that featured Peyton Manning's noodle arm......it happens.
 
Blackspider214 said:
Yeah I too want a loser QB who has never accomplished anything.

Y'all dorks clown Dak but then prop up this stat padding loser.
Click to expand...

You are literally "clowning" Stafford for being a loser, while defending Dak who hasn't won anything either. I know you fanboys hate looking at the stats that actually matter, but Dak is 9-11 in his last 20 starts. That doesn't scream winner.
 
I've always liked Stafford, but this isnt 2011 Stafford. He's not an upgrade from Dak at this point.
 
Hawkeye0202 said:
That's just it, picking 19 means all the top QBs will be gone. Not to mention, I'm sure Rivera wanna fool with a rookie. I think he feels his team is ready now. Also that fact they just Mayhew, who drafted Stafford, doesn't hurt at all. I can see them offering 19, their 3rd, and maybe 2022 pick. Of course, I could be wrong, so we'll see.
Click to expand...
You could be right. I actually hope you are. I am not threatened by Stafford at all. He is a career loser. I don’t think that will change. Hopefully the Football Team trades their 19th pick for him.
 
SDCowboy said:
:facepalm: How did I know this thread was going to be here?
Click to expand...

The same geniuses that told us that Dalton was better Dak are here this year to tell us that Stafford is better than Dak...It is almost like these people should be ignored.

If Phillip Rivers did not retire, they would be telling us how much an upgrade he is over Dak.
 
Staffo
DallasInDC said:
Based on what? Over the past 5 years Dak has a better completion percentage 66.0 vs 65.2, better YPA 7.7 vs 7.5, better Int/att 1.7 vs 1.8 better TD:INT ratio 2.65 vs 2.58, better QB rating 97.3 vs 96.0 with Dak playing 3 less games. Dak outperforms Stafford in nearly every stat with Stafford having 7 more years to hone his craft. If you compare Stafford's first 69 game the gap is even bigger.

Some people just throw stuff out there with nothing to back it up....oh, except I forgot about the scientifically and statistically accurate eye test. :rolleyes:
Click to expand...
Makes you realize why some people call Cowboy fans dumb.
 
Are people serious here? Stafford is nowhere near dak in talent level. I would want stafford over dalton for gods sake
 
atlantacowboy said:
You are literally "clowning" Stafford for being a loser, while defending Dak who hasn't won anything either. I know you fanboys hate looking at the stats that actually matter, but Dak is 9-11 in his last 20 starts. That doesn't scream winner.
Click to expand...
oh crap, you're going to hurt his feelings. let him keep crushing on dak.
 
basel90 said:
That would be the smart and forward thinking thing to do . Get a very affordable accurate texas kid into the team , draft a 2-4 round upcoming talent to groom . Use the savings to fix the D answer OL . Stanford is very accurate , way more than Dak .
Click to expand...
what is forward thinking about that? trade a pick to get a 33 year old washed up now injury prone QB...remember Romo in his last couple of years and his back problems. Plus, he is interception machine, with a dismal playoff record and a horrible record against teams with winning record (7-52).....and who is the upcoming talent? can you gaurantee he is going to turn out good? more than 90% of QBs drafted in round 2-7 fail to become starting QBs. 4 out 5 first round QBs fail to raise above average. Should we not draft one then (yes we did find Dak in the 4th), but its a big gamble when you already have a top 10 QB on your team..

I wouldn't give up any picks, not even a 7th rounder for stafford. we need all the picks and more to draft defense.
 
KJJ said:
The Joey Galloway trade blew up because we lost Troy Aikman. We were left with nothing at QB. Stafford may or may not be released out right we’ll just have to see. I certainly wouldn’t trade a premium pick for a 12 year QB that hasn’t won anything.
Click to expand...
yeah, but still it was a bad trade. you don't give up two first round picks for anyone but a QB and we already had Ismail, a down field threat on the team. Jerry is on record saying that we would be hard to stop with two speedsters and that tells you he was playing fantasy football in his head....that's not how you put a team together...and Jerry is a gambler, he wanted another superbowl and he was willing to bet on long odds and gamble away and then he got worse as things got worse
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Members online

Total: 2,643 (members: 44, guests: 2,599)

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
464,293
Messages
13,803,282
Members
23,776
Latest member
saturdaysarebetter
Back
Top