chuck520
Active Member
- Messages
- 332
- Reaction score
- 142
Then who is?Dak has had 8 years. At this point, it's apparent he's not the guy.
Then who is?Dak has had 8 years. At this point, it's apparent he's not the guy.
Lol-Dak every bit as good as Mahomes?!? Thank you for declaring that. I think you have plenty of same thinkers on the board.
I’m going to guess people who think this look at regular season statistics (overall), and win/loss team records (overall) in the regular season.
Yet somehow Cooper Rush is 5-1 as a starter the past couple of years.you dont even get to the playoffs without Dak so the playoffs would be moot. Think about that rationally.
Not Dak. So why make him the richest player in NFL history?Then who is?
That's better than try the same guy you've had for the last 8 years and knowing ahead of time what happensThen how do you find a QB that is able to handle pressure? Try a new QB every year and see what happens?
And his most recent LV bag comment right before a big game.. oof.Why is it ridiculous?
He's blamed his receivers for his shortcomings, more than once. He openly questioned some teammates work ethic in comparison to his own studiousness and preparation, while offering no evidence to support that charge
He's self branding himself without having done anything to earn his own brand
He constantly talks about everything he's doing and thinking "I'm in the best shape of my life, I'm pissed, I'm on a mission" often outside the context of the team
And he's about to demand to be the highest paid player in league history despite the truth that he hasn't earned it and it's going to hamstring our chances to win it all for the foreseeable future
What about all of that doesn't shout "me first". It's who he's always been and always will be.
What's truly ridiculous is this constant mantra about his alleged leadership cred. "Locker room loves him, everyone trusts him, etc". It's total nonsense and slowly but surely the truth is starting to leak out.
Thats what creates instability at the position and instability overall. In other words just throw what you can against the wall and see if it works?That's better than try the same guy you've had for the last 8 years and knowing ahead of time what happens
He's a phoney and people still fall for it.
Ok, what is your solution to finding a Super Bowl winning QB? If you have all the answers why arent you a GM?Not Dak. So why make him the richest player in NFL history?
How would he have been overall the past two years in your opinion, the same or better as Dak?Yet somehow Cooper Rush is 5-1 as a starter the past couple of years.
It's not one game, its continued inability to COMEBACK, when trailing (and/or coming back from a two score deficit....in the biggest games) . @GINeric, your point about penalties vrs SF, well yes (and game 2 you could point to Pollard's injury).....but it still doesnt detract from the fact Dak had the chance and came up short in both games.I am not going to argue Dak is the greatest QB ever, or that he deserves $60 million per year. But I also think criticisms of Dak are based on 1 game, which was not entirely his fault. He is the scapegoat for an entire teams that had complete lapses during the season. Dak has beaten teams with winning records, and he has had some horrible games against good teams, kind of like Tom Brady against Dallas in the playoffs last year.
These dudes that do that are scary bits that let the media tell them how to think. You’re right why don’t they do that for other positions if they care so much about not messing up?Right? And notice this anxiety only exists for the QB position of the Cowboys. Hey take a new CB - no one's here saying well wait a minute, we better not move off what we have because we might end up with Morris Claiborne. It's such a stupid argument to claim that you are going to pause any debate and attempt to improve because you are afraid of failure and all the while the talent you have on hand is failing.
But yet here you are with all the others constantly spending time on how you all do not like him.I lived through that Era and I will still take the unknown to the known of Dak. Sorry he is a choker that will never get it done. Stop wasting time on him.
That was after the playoff game. This was before the game. This fan base lives in the moment. When we were winning the majority of fans were happy with Dak but every time we lost a game they weren’t. Cowboys Nation would never be satisfied with any QB. When we’re winning they’ll be fine but as soon as we lose a game they’ll want a new QB.
That’s not how it works esp when you Dak worshippers got alllll the excuses for Dak using your stupid logic of playoff wins smh. If that’s the case you should stop all this Dak defending but you don’t so you don’t even believe the bs you kicking.see his playoff record. Dak choked as the #2 seed....Romo choked as the #1 seed.
Ok, what is your solution to finding a Super Bowl winning QB? If you have all the answers why arent you a GM?
And you are an NFL GM? Didn't think so....Ok, what is your solution to finding a Super Bowl winning QB? If you have all the answers why arent you a GM?
Probably the same. Decent playoff seed and early exit . Which is why I don't endorse giving him the keys to the kingdom in perpetuity and financially hamstringing the franchise for years to come. Same as I feel about Dak.How would he have been overall the past two years in your opinion, the same or better as Dak?
Tbh, is there a single person on this site who would say he IS the guy?Dak has had 8 years. At this point, it's apparent he's not the guy.
The early 2000 approach were about dumpster diving for a cheap replacements while in Cap hell. How they approached the QB debacle in the 00’s will serve as a lesson on what not to do, and not a reason for *NOT* moving on. The closest thing to this was the Lance trade, but we currently have an established starter so he can sit a bit. I would argue he’s young and was injured and has talent so while somewhat similar they’re different. This one might have a chance to pan out being he has pedigree and only 23.Thats what creates instability at the position and instability overall. In other words just throw what you can against the wall and see if it works?
Thats the early 2000s approach