The same Goff and Wentz who made it to super bowls before their rookie deals expired?or the same Dak Prescott that played the final year of his rookie contract for something like 2.3 million, while his peers (Goff and Wentz) were getting massive extensions. That guy, yeah.
damn... please read what I said. I said NOT a restructure, not something done to stay with the team... im talking about a player that there is absolutely nothing the team can do to force the player or incentivize the player to take a pay cut.happens semi-regularly. Darius Slayton just did it to stay in NY. Jimmy G did this offseason as well. Zeke just voluntarily offered to.
yeah. him. the better qbThe same Goff and Wentz who made it to super bowls before their rookie deals expired?
I did read and you did not say anything about "not something done to stay with the team" not really sure why that's a caveat. And yeah, just because Dak also sucked, the reasoning for the paycut would be to keep/acquire good players and improve the team.damn... please read what I said. I said NOT a restructure, not something done to stay with the team... im talking about a player that there is absolutely nothing the team can do to force the player or incentivize the player to take a pay cut.
Dak can not be traded without his approval. The Cowboys can not cut him. His money is his money........ no player in his position will take a pay cut.
Brady was offered as an example.... sorry, he is a one off that ha always taken less because he had so much money he could do what ever he wanted. Him taking less wasnt even comparable to Dak. You all calling for him taking less is because your argument is he isnt worth the money(I agree) and thus he should take less money until he wins.
Brady was the best qb in the game based upon SB wins, and he took less not because of poor performance, but he took less in order for the team to keep good players.
Here is what I said: Name me an NFL player that took a paycut from a guaranteed contract..... not a restructure to help a team deal with the cap, but a straight out pay cut?I did read and you did not say anything about "not something done to stay with the team" not really sure why that's a caveat. And yeah, just because Dak also sucked, the reasoning for the paycut would be to keep/acquire good players and improve the team.
Like sure the niners could have moved on from Jimmy G had he not agreed to a paycut, but he likely would have made much much more on the open market.
In any event it's definitely not likely, but not out of the realm of possibility.
You want to start winning this fanbase, and frankly, the locker room back?
Take a pay cut so we can keep the guys we have and improve even more on the free agency market.
Most of us are at the point where we would rather just trade you but your value is at an all time low. So we know we’re stuck with you so take a pay cut and prove your accountability!
Bingo... Daks deal isnt ridiculous for a top flight QB. If having Dak was putting us in the NFC title game eavery year (Burrow, Mahomes) Dak's deal would be a bargain.The money isn't the problem. The lack of talent Dak has is the problem.
You know how he would earn most fans respect?If he did that, it would boost my respect for him.
This is the best solution that can be given, Dak assumed the responsibility for the defeat, ok very well they are just words, he must prove it with deeds and the first step would be to cut his salary, since with what he has demonstrated he does not deserve to earn that money , this is where the type of person he is will be shown, and if he really cares about nothing but money or has the Cowboys shirt on.You want to start winning this fanbase, and frankly, the locker room back?
Take a pay cut so we can keep the guys we have and improve even more on the free agency market.
Most of us are at the point where we would rather just trade you but your value is at an all time low. So we know we’re stuck with you so take a pay cut and prove your accountability!