mattjames2010
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 21,835
- Reaction score
- 20,691
So what? You don't think it is odd that the only year that he has come close to playing at a decent level, just so happens to be the year that will determine how much money he will be offered with his next contract. It is s very high possibility that once he gets paid, his level of play will return to what it has been since he was drafted. There is a reason that Dallas didn't pick up the 5th year option on Mo. It would have been too expensive for a subpar player. Mo is much like Murray. Murray sure played well and even played hurt to impress the league so that he could get paid. He signed his big contract and his play has been bad and the injuries have returned. I am willing to bet that Mo does the same thing. Do you really want to give a big contract to a player that has been a draft bust and only has played well
Murray played at a high level 3 out of the 4 years he was here. What the hell was he supposed to do his rookie year, play through a broken leg? He had a broken hand in 2014, RBs play through that all the time.
And no I don't find it "weird", again, the guy had nearly a year off of doing nothing but studying with our DB coach. I'm sure getting a new contract is a motivator, so what?
And again, when has Mo ever been considered lazy? That was never his problem. We didn't pick up his option because he didn't play well and his injury history, obviously. As I've stated, if Claiborne continues to play at a high level, who on the FA wire are we going to replace him with if we let him walk? If he declines as the season goes on or ends with an injury, let him walk. But if we get him at a good price, I don't see how it's a smart thing and to let him walk.