Rogah
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 6,473
- Reaction score
- 793
Uh, yes it does. It is like someone saying to you "Why did you punch your girlfriend in the face last night?" Hopefully your response would be that you did no such thing. Then they say "I'm just trying to judge your intent, so tell me why you punched your girlfriend in the face last night."Observing intent is necessary, and does not automatically assume guilt.
Newsflash: That's exactly what they did. In one of Belichick's press conferences he talked all about physics, how much he had learned about ball preparation, and how they had spent the last several days talking to scientists and running their own experiments.If they had come out and been transparent and had a reasonable explanation, (like the low limit theory), their intent would have revealed honesty at the outset.
Thank you for 100% proving my point.As for the other teams, I haven't heard about their cheating stories, so I don't know.
You don't give 2 turds about fairplay
You don't give 2 turds about cometitive balance
You don't give 2 turds about integrity of the game
You don't, as you claim, "despise cheating." What you despise is the Patriots for all their success. All you care about is your personal vendetta against all things Patriot. Anyone who genuinely cared about fairplay would want all teams held to an equal standard and receive equal punishments for equal infractions.
There it is, folks. It's the Patriots' fault that the Vikings illegally heated their footballs. It's the Patriots' fault the Browns texted messages to the sidelines. I suppose it's also the Patriots' fault that Jerry Rice use stick'em all those years ago, huh?But that's kind of the point, if the Patriots win the super bowl in a scandal with blatant cheating, every team will increase or start cheating to win.
You're like a traffic cop that sees a Volkswagen doing 75 in a 70, so you do nothing about it.
Then you see a Subaru doing 75 in a 70, so you do nothing about it.
Then you see a Mazda doing 75 in a 70, so you do nothing about it.
Then you see a Lamborghini doing 75 in a 70, so you pull the guy over, walk up to the car, tell the driver "you were breaking the law and all I care about is the integrity of our laws" and you shoot him dead right there on the spot.
Then it turns out that your radar gun was malfunctioning and the Lamborghini probably wasn't even doing 75 MPH in the first place, but you just shrug your shoulders and say to yourself "well I caught that same guy speeding 7 years ago so he got what he deserved."