CowboysFaninHouston
CowboysFaninDC
- Messages
- 36,130
- Reaction score
- 20,970
look at the top 10 bad suggestions...and 8 of them belong to leeblair LOLthis suggestion ranks among the worst i've read in quite a while.
look at the top 10 bad suggestions...and 8 of them belong to leeblair LOLthis suggestion ranks among the worst i've read in quite a while.
actually the eagles OL was better than the cowboys and Wentz has had better WR group than Dak for most of his career. and definitely the best TE sets in the game.....Dak had better OL and RB and WR combos and lost so many playoff and other games against losing teams . Surprisingly he is not being blamed . Why is Wentz being blamed then with a worse team ?
I don't blame you for ignoring @Dak_Attack_09 which you must be doing.look at the top 10 bad suggestions...and 8 of them belong to leeblair LOL
Good post. I always contend and argue that the O is not solely on the QB.I'm all for signing and keeping Dak, but I get tired of people talking about how he had the number one offense.....which is entirely true but misleading. That's a metric totaled in yards only and has nothing to do with scoring or td throws.
Generally, Dak struggles with that aspect in the first couple of quarters in games and it's a regular thing. Then the Cowboys have to play catch up, while also dealing with their defense being exhausted because the offense couldn't do its job.
Note, that's not all on Dak, but he contributes. And he's very good and should be signed...but defending him with the "Number one offense" stance is lame. SCORES are what matters. Who cares if they got 400 yards but can't get in the red zone? Looking at the career stats between Dak and Wentz, there's not a whole lot of difference.....which tells you that stats can certainly mislead because anyone can see Dak is a much better QB than Wentz. Neither are guys that can carry a team and both need plenty of help....but those kind of QB's are super rare.
Agreed that simply pointing to #1 offense doesn't tell the whole story and can be misleading, but it wasn't just yardage. They were scoring big too when Dak was playing (32+ ppg). If they weren't #1 in scoring before Dak got hurt they had to be very close to it. I think most of the struggles in the first half this year were from the turnovers - mostly fumbles, And those were in a few individual games, but overall I don't believe there a huge gap between 1st half and 2nd half scoring.I'm all for signing and keeping Dak, but I get tired of people talking about how he had the number one offense.....which is entirely true but misleading. That's a metric totaled in yards only and has nothing to do with scoring or td throws.
Generally, Dak struggles with that aspect in the first couple of quarters in games and it's a regular thing. Then the Cowboys have to play catch up, while also dealing with their defense being exhausted because the offense couldn't do its job.
Note, that's not all on Dak, but he contributes. And he's very good and should be signed...but defending him with the "Number one offense" stance is lame. SCORES are what matters. Who cares if they got 400 yards but can't get in the red zone? Looking at the career stats between Dak and Wentz, there's not a whole lot of difference.....which tells you that stats can certainly mislead because anyone can see Dak is a much better QB than Wentz. Neither are guys that can carry a team and both need plenty of help....but those kind of QB's are super rare.
I'd like that, but the Cowboys always take too long to get it right.
They should've signed Keenum as soon as he was available two years ago.
And they have kept Dak already a year too long. As long as he is here, Garrett is here.
6? 12-18 dude.I wish Jerry had your eye for talent evaluation. We would have won 6 super bowls under your watch.
Could just be the egg on face factor, but that's no way to run a franchise.Eh, unless they don't want him potentially rebounding and blowing up in their face 2x a year.
Long as you feel better. That's all that matters.stop making excuses for wentz.
he sucks.
DALLAS>philly.
DAK>wentz.
5>1.
i feel better now.
I think he'll go to the Colts and be great for them.
It was obvious he was going to struggle this year before the season started. He'll bounce back
Better OL than Dallas’s the past few years ? Many experts won’t agree , same for the WR group and add to that the RB position when zeke was in his prime .actually the eagles OL was better than the cowboys and Wentz has had better WR group than Dak for most of his career. and definitely the best TE sets in the game.....
and when Dak got Cooper, then he was the #1 passer in the league....something wentz couldn't smell in his wildest dream....and wentz is made of crystal, sneeze and he gets hurt for 3 games.
Nothing special there . A QB this young should be ascending and not descending . The finale last year was very telling , and a loss when it matters .. , and Dak would not have made a difference in the loss this year .How about the discussion on why Dallas beat the Eagles several times prior?
because he's not.
how isn't it hate sticking up for the eagles QB.
c'mon tony stark...i expect better from you.
because i'm on vacation.why do you bother trying to reason with some moron who’s only MO is to say something stupid so you react?
Dak has completely embarrassed all his doubters. He will be here for another 5-7 years minimum. Let them cry about it all they want.