Can't pay everyone. Mahomes isn't going to win it all again w/o a D.Ok lets say jerry put you in charge of cowboys 2 weeks ago, would you have tried to get hill?
This includes that jerry wanted amari gone regardless.
Also I dont know hill , but whether I like him or not, I know his value to a team. So that is what is important
if your a GM.
Hill is a dynamic WR, one of the fastest wr, and importantly he is good at catching a short to midrange pass
and getting yac, breaking a big run off a short pass.
This is what dak needs, more than a guy who can run deep passes, as dak is 50 50 on those longer passes.
you can use hill on a reverse, in backfield, short, medium , and long.
He is also good at clearing areas, and getting dbl covered to clear a area for another wr.
He would have been perfect for Dak.
And if I had to trade lamb to get picks back, I would then trade lamb.
Hill is by far better than lamb.
So jones boys made no effort or try to get him, is that stupid? If you try and fail, thats ok, and I dont
mean stephen low balling hill lol.
I was just watching the kc dallas game , and KC is going to miss hill, they were stupid to not resign him.
and I cant believe Miami of all teams got him ! So many teams besides dallas blew a chance at one
of the best wr in the nfl.
Luckily.Tyreek Hill would be much more expensive than what a miser like Stephen Jones would accommodate.
Sorry to say so, but that's a pipe dream. We'd surely be blessed to sign another WR to compare to him.
If this season's version of the Cowboys would only resolve our problems with the OL, we'd be fortunate.
Luckily.
Hill is not the missing piece. We're never going to get there w/o a D.
I would love to have Hill, but not at the cost of high draft picks and a huge salary.True. A good D will still be missing if we can't stop both the run and pass better than we have lately. Let's hope our DL steps up bigtime.
Lol…..no freaking way. That was the dumbest trade and signing in the history.Ok lets say jerry put you in charge of cowboys 2 weeks ago, would you have tried to get hill?
This includes that jerry wanted amari gone regardless.
Also I dont know hill , but whether I like him or not, I know his value to a team. So that is what is important
if your a GM.
Hill is a dynamic WR, one of the fastest wr, and importantly he is good at catching a short to midrange pass
and getting yac, breaking a big run off a short pass.
This is what dak needs, more than a guy who can run deep passes, as dak is 50 50 on those longer passes.
you can use hill on a reverse, in backfield, short, medium , and long.
He is also good at clearing areas, and getting dbl covered to clear a area for another wr.
He would have been perfect for Dak.
And if I had to trade lamb to get picks back, I would then trade lamb.
Hill is by far better than lamb.
So jones boys made no effort or try to get him, is that stupid? If you try and fail, thats ok, and I dont
mean stephen low balling hill lol.
I was just watching the kc dallas game , and KC is going to miss hill, they were stupid to not resign him.
and I cant believe Miami of all teams got him ! So many teams besides dallas blew a chance at one
of the best wr in the nfl.
NO NO NO not at 30 mil per lmao just no there reason KC let him walk hes great elite for sure but that just too much allocated to a WR..Ok lets say jerry put you in charge of cowboys 2 weeks ago, would you have tried to get hill?
This includes that jerry wanted amari gone regardless.
Also I dont know hill , but whether I like him or not, I know his value to a team. So that is what is important
if your a GM.
Hill is a dynamic WR, one of the fastest wr, and importantly he is good at catching a short to midrange pass
and getting yac, breaking a big run off a short pass.
This is what dak needs, more than a guy who can run deep passes, as dak is 50 50 on those longer passes.
you can use hill on a reverse, in backfield, short, medium , and long.
He is also good at clearing areas, and getting dbl covered to clear a area for another wr.
He would have been perfect for Dak.
And if I had to trade lamb to get picks back, I would then trade lamb.
Hill is by far better than lamb.
So jones boys made no effort or try to get him, is that stupid? If you try and fail, thats ok, and I dont
mean stephen low balling hill lol.
I was just watching the kc dallas game , and KC is going to miss hill, they were stupid to not resign him.
and I cant believe Miami of all teams got him ! So many teams besides dallas blew a chance at one
of the best wr in the nfl.
NoOk lets say jerry put you in charge of cowboys 2 weeks ago, would you have tried to get hill?
This includes that jerry wanted amari gone regardless.
Also I dont know hill , but whether I like him or not, I know his value to a team. So that is what is important
if your a GM.
Hill is a dynamic WR, one of the fastest wr, and importantly he is good at catching a short to midrange pass
and getting yac, breaking a big run off a short pass.
This is what dak needs, more than a guy who can run deep passes, as dak is 50 50 on those longer passes.
you can use hill on a reverse, in backfield, short, medium , and long.
He is also good at clearing areas, and getting dbl covered to clear a area for another wr.
He would have been perfect for Dak.
And if I had to trade lamb to get picks back, I would then trade lamb.
Hill is by far better than lamb.
So jones boys made no effort or try to get him, is that stupid? If you try and fail, thats ok, and I dont
mean stephen low balling hill lol.
I was just watching the kc dallas game , and KC is going to miss hill, they were stupid to not resign him.
and I cant believe Miami of all teams got him ! So many teams besides dallas blew a chance at one
of the best wr in the nfl.
actually we were 9th in the league in YAC.....There are two schools of thought. Given:
does that mean Hill is exactly what we need (gives us what we're missing), or Hill is a terrible idea (his value would be squandered here)?
- Dak's offenses have not been strong at hit-in-stride, high RAC yards, and
- Hill is one of the best at that,