Never said Rush was a starting QB. But if Rush was starting you'd save on Dak's CAP hit. You get Rush(esque) type QB (+ CAP Space) OR Elite QB. The difference is that the elite QB needs to play up to that contract, whereas the lesser QB has the roster to make up for his lesser abilities.
The CAP space is so relevant (we sit on it, because of Dak's hit in 2025).
the question is not cap space....its never been an issue. we had 23M on the cap this year and could have used it to sign a legit DT...but didn't.
the question is will we spend the cap space and the answer is clearly no.
and I am sure most will respond with, we need the cap space for next year, and the year after and the year afte....yet Jerry said he is all in......
you get a small window to do something special in the NFL and then pay the piper with dead cap space.....you don't just worry about next year all the time..... you win now.
look at the Rams...they went all in and they won a superbowl.
Philly reloaded with a bunch of new top 5 contracts they handed out...they are top 2 in NFC....
and I read multiple articles that with 3, 4 contract restructures we can open up about 65-70M in cap space....and we can still redo Dak's contract to have more space.
you don't live today for cap space of tomorrow. you invest today.....you had a 12-5 team that needed DL help and some saftey help...you go out and get it...you don't say, but 2025!!!!
secondly, there are 9 other teams that have QBs that are averaging 52M or more...you want to tell me because of 8M we are handicapped to sucking!!!! how is they are doing it? that includes GB, Detroit., chargers....
no, this narrative of cap space issue can be easily managed with a competent GM