darthseinfeld
Groupthink Guru
- Messages
- 32,367
- Reaction score
- 36,815
Yes sirShannon Sharpe?
Yes sirShannon Sharpe?
The money for either will interesting. We will know if they are signed on as starters or if they are signed on as swing OT's.
We know they can play swing. Starter is somewhat of a projection
I agree. If we pick up a receiver in FA, I don't see us making it a draft priority unless we just flat out want to replace Bryant. Of course, one of the things the front office does try to do each year is have enough bodies at each position that it isn't absolutely forced to draft a certain position.
New England also might not want to pay that money for a backup. If they have two swing OT's capable of being on the open market getting contracts, they might just feel confident in their ability to replace them with rookie contract guysRight, the money will tell you.
I can't imagine either player would be interested in Dallas unless it's as a starter. Talk about going from the penthouse to the outhouse going from New England to here.
Either could be cut. Inman and Hunter are competition for Noah Brown. Not anyone on the top half of the depth chartWell then you are essentially bringing back the same poor WR group of last year. Inman and Hunter are scrubs. Roster fillers.
I feel like we're all on the Andrea Gail and the wind's picking up.
The Jones way to improve the team is to disappear to the Bahamas during the busiest week of the off season.............I'm not saying to get crazy and overspend on free agents, I'm not even saying to sign one, but you should atleast TRY and see if you can improve an area of your team.You just have to LOL at this quote:
Shannon Sharpe?Worked out for another former 7th round WR. 5 likes to the first person who knows who I am referencing
Wouldn’t you want your swing tackle and 4th WR to be low cost playersSounds like more of the same crap as last year. Expecting low cost trash players to push you to the top is stupid.
New England also might not want to pay that money for a backup. If they have two swing OT's capable of being on the open market getting contracts, they might just feel confident in their ability to replace them with rookie contract guys
Well then you are essentially bringing back the same poor WR group of last year. Inman and Hunter are scrubs. Roster fillers.
Bellyaching aside, this is pretty much true to form. These are swing OT candidates, which makes sense. And we’re looking to add speed at WR. They’re going to want Brown to take Butler’s role, and a guy like Inman to fill in the roster spot makes some sense. Then maybe we’ll move on to the LB problems we created for ourselves.
With how those guys played last year? I see no reason why all of their jobs aren't up for grabs.Well if they are not competing with Noah, what spot are they going to take? Switzer, Beasley, Williams and Dez aren't going anywhere and I HOPE they are going to draft a WR in the first 2-3 rounds. That leaves Brown.