Is there any WR on this list you wouldn’t take over Lamb?

Again, hyperbole. Because Rush looks for him more or pushes the ball to him doesn’t indicate any QBing superiority. Just that he’s more beneficial to CeeDee’s statline.

I wonder why Rush looked for him often and why he’s Daks top target?

#1 #1 #1
 
I wonder why Rush looked for him often and why he’s Daks top target?

#1 #1 #1

32 #1’s in the nfl with that definition. He’s Dallas’s top target because they don’t have better. If they had better he wouldn’t be. And it circled all the way back to Devonta again.
 
On pace for it…

Cmon, you know you want to. #1 #1 #1!

And if he has another TB game and suddenly he’s back on pace for sub-1200. True #1’s don’t go game-to-game on the precipice of whether or not they’re good enough. They’ve done it. He hasn’t

No matter how much you pom pom for it to happen, that won’t change
 
And if he has another TB game and suddenly he’s back on pace for sub-1200. True #1’s don’t go game-to-game on the precipice of whether or not they’re good enough. They’ve done it. He hasn’t

No matter how much you pom pom for it to happen, that won’t change

How about AJ against Ari and his 32 yard performance?

111111111111111111111111111111111111111111
 
I hope you people that are mad at Lamb right now, I hope you understand he's a young dude that has some learning to do... that's on the coaches. Be mad at the coaching staff too, folks. Coach is not exempt from criticism.
 
How about AJ against Ari and his 32 yard performance?

111111111111111111111111111111111111111111

Yeah it was a down game. And he’s had multiple games with more yards than CeeDee yesterday to comp for it. CeeDee has been sub-100 for 13 months before yesterday, and now we’re banking on him suddenly repeating that enough to hit 1400? What sense does that make.
 
Yeah it was a down game. And he’s had multiple games with more yards than CeeDee yesterday to comp for it. CeeDee has been sub-100 for 13 months before yesterday, and now we’re banking on him suddenly repeating that enough to hit 1400? What sense does that make.

Makes a lot of sense bc he’s WR1 and that’s what he’s tracking for.
 
Probably a 1a / 1b type scenario. Both are studs.

“Stud” is a relative term. Gallup has shown to be a stud on many occasions. None of the 3 are true #1’s. Gallup’s career season is roughly the same as CeeDee’s and Cooper’s
 
“Stud” is a relative term. Gallup has shown to be a stud on many occasions. None of the 3 are true #1’s. Gallup’s career season is roughly the same as CeeDee’s and Cooper’s

Gallup has had 1 good year…not WR1.

We’ve established Lamb is WR1. Cooper is balling out on a run heavy team with a below average QB. WR1.
 
Gallup has had 1 good year…not WR1.

We’ve established Lamb is WR1. Cooper is balling out on a run heavy team with a below average QB. WR1.

They’re both WR1’s of course. Not true #1’s but the best WRs in their rosters for sure at least until Gallup is healthy.
 

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
464,113
Messages
13,789,547
Members
23,772
Latest member
BAC2662
Back
Top