Even the most hardened critics place Prescott more in the middle of the pack somewhere between 10-15th caliber ranking . His yearly stats would place him average to above average .
But your personal analysis tells you he’s “ bad” . Which is a very subjective description. Are you able to provide a more precise type ranking ?
I already did that. Some time ago. And i gave a list of examples of QBs who are elite, good or average (During this time i had Prescott still ranked as an average QB. Lower end of average but still average).
Here is an example:
elite: A.Rodgers, P. Manning, J.Montana, D.Marino, B.Favre
good: S.Young, P. Mahomes, T.Brady, R.WIlson, T.Rothlisberger, T.Aikman
average: K.Cousins, J.Goff, B.Mayfield, J.Flacco
bad: D.Prescott
There are right now a lot of young QBs with 1 or 2 years of NFL experience which i dont want to rank. Just because this is just a too short time to judge what their real capabilities are.
All of the QBs also have a talent level which i for myself take into account when evaluating them. So for instance (even if he isnt ranked by me): Burrowsy or Lawrence have both elite talent level. Prescott to me has average talent level.
But i dont earn money with that. I do this for myself out of fun.
To rank Prescott anywhere in a ranking of current QBs does not say anything about his general level of play. So in essence this does not contrtadict with how i judge him.
Placing him at 15 for instance does only say there are 14 better QBs in front of him. But it does not tell you if those 14 QBs are high school level QBs or all elite ones. And usually those experts put Prescott every week in another spot. How can that be ? How can the talent of a QB vary so much in just one week ? Answer: The most rankings are meant to give the mainstream reader new stuff to read/discuss/comment about.