Not from hers if she agreed to it. They corroborated her timeline with the metadata of the pictures of her bruises and her encounters with Zeke.
It's still circumstantial, but it added up chronologically.
Not really. Their evidence is bruises. Zeke's team points to pictures of bruises prior to his arrival. And it's dismissed without a second thought. She has three distinct bruise timelines. One set when Zeke wasn't there. One set from a fight, where the NFL report contradicts sworn affidavits. And one set supposedly from Zeke. The NFL took her word that the bruises blamed on Zeke were from DV. The other two sets were disregarded and unexplained.
TT: Hey he beat me look at these bruises.
NFL: Mr. Elliott, can you explain these bruises?
EE: Well no but there's pictures of bruises before I even got there. What's the explanation for those? And there's other bruises from a fight.
NFL: The timing of these bruises aligns with our victim's story, disregarding the one's that don't.
However, in the commissioners’ judgement, there has been no persuasive evidence presented on your behalf with respect to how Ms. Thompson’s obvious injuries were inccurred other than conjecture based on the presence of some of her bruising which pre-dates your arrival in Columbus on July, 16, 2016.