Ah, cute. We already went over this. An AFO does not prevent flexion of the forefoot downward. You claiming the AFO is rigid is either based out of being stubborn intellectual dishonesty (sorta like you claiming he was wearing the same bulky AFO from August of last year) or plain ignorance.
There are static AFOs and dynamic AFOs. The latter allows plantar flexion of the forefoot and rigidness to help lift the foot up.
Calling me dishonest after characterizing a paragraph as a blurb and claiming it doesn't mention nerve firing only to ignore the rebuttal is rich if not surprising from you.
I will reiterate that there is a news article that directly mentions his body is catching up to an already firing nerve.
As for your wishcasting of a new AFO:
I want you to take your argument about "stubborn intellectual dishonesty" --I knew you wouldn't be able to help yourself-- and apply it to your wishcasting that he is wearing a different brace. What evidence of a brace do you have at all whatsoever?
Further, I did not say that he was wearing it. I said it was obvious that he was not wearing it. He was wearing a dynamic AFO before, I linked its product page before after showing a still of it from TC. It had Ritchie stamped on the side of it making the search remarkably easy.
That was my entire point, he wore that brace before when we know he had a complete palsy. You are claiming that there is no change in that condition. Why would he change braces if there was still a complete palsy and no change?
Wearing a semirigid brace that he could in theory hide would be less support and imply an improvement in the condition.
Let's talk about AFO's though. There are several types of AFO's. There are the springloaded kind, like he wore before, that are big and bulky which he is clearly not wearing.
There are the semi-rigid kind that depend on the rigidity of the material they are made out of to return a foot to the upright position. That is what you are wishcasting that he is wearing. There are multiple reasons why I think that is not the case.
1) There is no evidence of him wearing one at all whatsoever.
2) They supply less support than the brace he was wearing before.
3) The motion in the video looks even and fluid. This would be near impossible to achieve with a semi-rigid piece of plastic strapped to the back of only one foot.
4) The thing about semi-rigid material is that it applies resistance regardless of the direction that you try and deform the material from its original shape. Sure it will pick the foot back up when it is pushed down but it will also work against any power the calf puts into the range of motion robbing an athlete of even more athleticism. Recall the motion was fluid and even.
5) He points the toe down at a steep angle without leverage on the way down. If he has a brace holding his foot up why would he fight the brace to the steep angle evident in the still? It looks to me that his peroneal is still weak and he just let his foot go after reaching the desired position which was the point of the exaggerated high knee hurdling.