OmerV
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 26,139
- Reaction score
- 22,634
Woulda coulda shoulda
Stephen begin pinching pennies after 2014 season with Leary and Murray. Our OL still hadn’t recovered and we had to use a 5th overall pick to shore up a running game with what was heralded best OL .
I still think cutting Bailey will cost us this year. And we should have negotiated with Dez offering him less. We didn’t even make an offer.
And if we end up coughing big money and years for Dak it could stifle this franchise for another era. Tick Tock
I didn't point out ET and Watkins to say they had been successful, I was merely pointing out they were willing. You had indicated no willingness.
Let me ask you this - would you rather have Leary or Martin, Frederick and Smith? Obviously the Cowboys would like to have kept Leary, but there is a limit to how much money can be used on one unit. Plus, remember that at the time they didn't realize Free was going to retire, so they though they had Collins ready to step in. In any case, if a team sinks all its money into the O-Line, how much is left for other areas? The Cowboys dished out big money to Frederick and Smith and knew Martin's contract was coming up too. An NFL team doesn't get to just look at the moment and not consider other contracts that are coming up, but fans don't have to bother with that so they can just allocate money any way they can imagine.
As for Dak, don't start pinning something on the team that hasn't happened. Dak is at least a year away from a decision needing to be made, and possibly even longer than that. Besides, isn't a little funny you are on the one hand calling the team cheap, and on the other hand complaining that the team will spend too much on Dak?
Again, I agree that the team has gone a little too conservative with signing free agents from other teams, but it's a bit understandable given the way the team had screwed itself in the past by handing out too many big contracts. It's just a matter of figuring out the middle ground.
Last edited: