Jarntt
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 4,941
- Reaction score
- 6,554
You literally don’t even make any sense dude. Who is saying otherwise and even if people were, it’s a thread about a Diggs and he played in both games.2 and 0.
You literally don’t even make any sense dude. Who is saying otherwise and even if people were, it’s a thread about a Diggs and he played in both games.2 and 0.
You don't think we have a good secondary with Gilmore, Bland, Lewis, Wilson, Kearse, and Hooker? Isn't that the best secondary in the league?You literally don’t even make any sense dude. Who is saying otherwise and even if people were, it’s a thread about a Diggs and he played in both games.
why do you keep making things up? Who said we don’t have a good secondary?You don't think we have a good secondary with Gilmore, Bland, Lewis, Wilson, Kearse, and Hooker? Isn't that the best secondary in the league?
This is a two year old take, largely still purported by the media and fans of other teams. It’s not how he played last year or this.As good as Diggs is he takes too many risks and gets burned at times. Last Sunday he was saved twice by teammates. Maybe with Bland he isn't the ball hawk Diggs is, but he can ball and most likely won't be as aggressive as Diggs at getting burnt. He is an up and rising star so we should be good!!
You said it was a problemwhy do you keep making things up? Who said we don’t have a good secondary?
But, no it’s not the best in the league without Diggs
No. I said it’s a problem for the team to go from Diggs to Bland/Lewis And anyone who doesn’t wear Cowboy underoos would agreeYou said it was a problem