eromeopolk
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 4,718
- Reaction score
- 4,523
Yes he traded down after the CBs were gone. Did not get a no.1 next year like nearly every other GM.
He’s not trading down…makes no sense to. Draft bpa don’t make this any harder than it has to be….you are not some draft wizard….
Yeah I guess I should say if they get a good deal i'm for it but typically they don't.Agree, if do trade back they better make out like a bandit, which means staying put.
90% chance he trades down. Drafting a 6-8 RT that only started 8 games to replace T. Smith is a dumb decision.He’s not trading down…makes no sense to. Draft bpa don’t make this any harder than it has to be….you are not some draft wizard….
Yeah I guess I should say if they get a good deal i'm for it but typically they don't.
The problem is that they can't just draft BPA.He’s not trading down…makes no sense to. Draft bpa don’t make this any harder than it has to be….you are not some draft wizard….
It’s too good and deep a draft not to trade down. We must get another pick in the 3rd or 4th round. There’s is not likely to be a player at 24 that makes it worth going from pick 87 to to 184 without a selection.He’s not trading down…makes no sense to. Draft bpa don’t make this any harder than it has to be….you are not some draft wizard….
Well the good news is we need a LT, OC, possible a Guard, if we move Smith, a RB, DT, DE, LB, WR and a CB.The problem is that they can't just draft BPA.
They have pretty much backed themselves into having to land at least one if not two offensive line starters in the first two rounds.
At that point my grieving stage would go to Shock.Just read two reports Jerry is trying to move up and get the Falcons 8th spot and get one of the top WR which in turn means Lamb may not get 30 mill a year. All kinds of talk out there tonight.
You never know who’s going to be aroundJerry, there is no Micah Parsons available by the 24th pick. Quit messing around. Trade down that #24th original pick TWICE and pick up some much needed picks.
The problem is that they can't just draft BPA.
They have pretty much backed themselves into having to land at least one if not two offensive line starters in the first two rounds.
My stance on this thinking is it just never works. Extra picks doesn't mean better players. More times than not those guys bust. So it depends what i'm trading away from in the 1st. Sometime I can take a single or a double in the 1st round as opposed to striking out completely.It’s too good and deep a draft not to trade down. We must get another pick in the 3rd or 4th round. There’s is not likely to be a player at 24 that makes it worth going from pick 87 to to 184 without a selection.
We don't pick that far away from KC to get a 3rd rounder from KC. Maybe a 4th though.I think you have to consider it if you can pick up a 3&4 from KC.
The problem is that they can't just draft BPA.
They have pretty much backed themselves into having to land at least one if not two offensive line starters in the first two rounds.
to get a 4th from 24 tells me you must be trading out of the 1st.
Just throwing this out there:We don't pick that far away from KC to get a 3rd rounder from KC. Maybe a 4th though.
How so? They like Bass and Hoffman and said they are comfortable with them startingThey have pretty much backed themselves into having to land at least one if not two offensive line starters in the first two rounds.