The problem here is that you, and a couple others, think if someone makes a comment about just dak, they've just absolved the rest of the team from fault.
You cant go through everyone else first, every single time, before getting to dak.
But of course dak gets a lot of heat. Qbs and coaches always do....its not dak hate just the way it is, always has been always will.
Theres only like 2 people here out of thousands and thousands....blaming just dak.
Is it worth a crusade against everyone?
It's more than just two here blaming just Dak for everything. I'm definitely not a crusade, I'm just come from the era of backing up what you say with real life facts.
I come from an era where your words are respected and mean something.
See alot of these folks aren't cut from that cloth because they'll lie on a man and run and hide like *****es when called out to make their statements match up with real life facts and occurrences.
You don't even see what I've done. It's not a crusade but what I do is kill their narratives and hypocrisy with their OWN logic using other players at the same player's position in the same situations. I LITERALLY make them look dumb as **** with their own logistical set ups.
Long story short, it's fun as hell embarrassing trolls and making them publicly hang themselves with their own blueprint of player expectations and measurement systems. There's a reason why they run and hide like cowardly *****es when I rebuttal them with THEIR logic.
Examples.....
1.They say Dak is a bum, below average.
- I'll ask them what other bum below average quarterbacks have been perennial top 10 and in a few seasonsthe team has led the leaguei in penalties, lead the league in certain categories, become All Pro and MVP with a one dimensional offense with a weak running game?
They're response (crickets)
2. They say a quarterback is judged by Superbowls and Dak is not clutch enough to lead us to a Superbowl victory.
- I'll say ok, fair enough, no argument until he's proven that. But according to your logic.... if quarterbacks are judged on Superbowls alone and it's all up to them to accomplish in a team sport.... then surely Nick Foles and Trent Dilpher are much more clutch than Jim Kelly and Dan Marino because Foles and Dilpher delivered championship rings and Kelly and Marino couldn't, according to YOUR logic, correct??
Their response (crickets)
I have many other examples, but this post is already long enough. The point is, I'll let trolls, haters, whatever these weak people are, hang themselves with their OWN logic to crush their narratives. It's really entertaining to do that.
