LandryFan
Proud Native Texan, USMC-1972-79, USN-1983-2000
- Messages
- 7,400
- Reaction score
- 6,347
They have paid him all year to be an inactive #3. I just think they end up dumping him finally this offseason, which is probably what they should have done in September. He's just a big fat pimple on their roster right now.
Exactly. I posted a link to an article a minute ago that says that by exercising the 5th year option they virtually guaranteed that they wouldn't play him so that he wouldn't get injured and force them into having to fork over $16M in 2016. They could have done nothing and had his services this year (if they chose to play him) and still cut him in the offseason.