joseephuss
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 28,041
- Reaction score
- 6,920
Maybe don't know
I know Michael Johnson has a workout facility in the Dallas area and many athletes have worked out there in the past. Michael is a Dallas native.
Maybe don't know
If Ben Johnson has a facility it involves HGH and steroids.
But it would have been an indefinite suspension, and would have set up the exact same situation as now in having him go in to seek reinstatement. It also wouldn't have helped his cause at all.
Also not sure why his retirement to go on trial and serve the sentence to follow means much. Perhaps it would have been enough had he not dug a deeper hole while waiting to go to trial. He was initially supposed to go to trial in September so he basically retired at a time when he couldn't have played. You retired so you could go to trial and jail, how upstanding of you to do that.
He's probably getting the suspension for the additional failed drug tests last summer while waiting to go on trial, and it's likely that these tests were the thing that prompted him to retire. His retirement came just a couple weeks after he surrendered for the failed tests.
He was probably advised by his lawyer, and Jerry for that matter, to retire just for the sake of preventing any possibility of racking up additional violations of the personal conduct policy.
Goodell can't let him walk back into the league or he will appear soft again. Just to take a guess I'd say he gets 2-4 games but really, what does it matter? It's not like Brent is a big difference maker that will make our defense legit when he returns.I would hope the Commish sees fit to deal with Brent with reasonable understanding that a year's suspension would possibly constitute an inordinately harsh punishment. I say this due to the fact that another year's layoff could have a devastating effect upon a player who has already been forced to undergo in excess of a year's separation from football.
Goodell can't let him walk back into the league or he will appear soft again. Just to take a guess I'd say he gets 2-4 games but really, what does it matter? It's not like Brent is a big difference maker that will make our defense legit when he returns.
I very well could have gotten the name wrong. It's the Dallas based sports training complex that Holland Gurode etc work with NFL linemen.
Or he could have been advised by the NFL who has been involved from the beggining of the tragedy.
Very true. After the first two failures, the league could have told him he can retire and not have any future events be brought up for consideration, or he could risk losing any chance at all of coming back by getting in more trouble.
All Brent would have to do to be a substantial upgrade is simply be average. He was exactly that when he last played.
The NFL drug treatment program is explicitly laid out in the CBA. I think there is about a 0% chance that Goodell would list drug tests outside NFL testing as cause.
He wouldn't have to. He has anything covered with the personal conduct policy.
If he feels additional failed tests and subsequent surrender reflected poorly on the league, he could suspend him.
Again, the substance abuse portion of the CBA is very explicit. Of course he can do whatever he wants but he won't put a drug test administered outside the CBA testing as cause nevertheless. Your entire narrative is conjecture anyway. We have no way of knowing what discussions took place.
One on steroids and one tested positive for stimulants at an extremely low dose 6ppm (same level you'd see by using an over the counter cold medicine) and has since been raised. One called for an immediate ban and the other raised flags for further testing. Not really the same thing but nice try.
given the backlash that Goodell got with the whole Ray Rice scenario, I think he is going to bring down the hammer on this suspension.
After a player has dealt with the criminal justice system, a suspension is essentially meaningless, IMO. I fail to see the point because it looks like they are just piling on after the whistle.
I dont think Brent's lawyer sees it as piling on.
Jose Brent got away with (figuratively) murder. He's lucky to be walking around a free man. Any other guy he'd be in the pen for a dozen years.