Julius Jones Can Be Easily Replaced In The Draft

burmafrd;1426720 said:
come on prophet- you threw a few names and nothing else. THAT means nothing. And you wonder why so many people make fun of you?
take each one of those names and make a case for them. Otherwise most people here will continue to laugh at you.
He can't. That would require football knowledge.
 
InmanRoshi;1426714 said:
Next year is going to be Julius' breakout year.

If not next year, the year after that.

If not that year, the year after that.

Just you watch.
Deja vu. I could have sworn you and I had this debate about QBs. Only the other way around.
 
TheProphet;1426725 said:
Well at least this guy gets it, when it comes to how some around here will defend JuJones....:lmao2:
That's just it Profit, not one of us has defended Julius Jones. We've simply asked you, philo, or bigbadroy to lay out a plan of attack to improve and none of you can.

Impotence is jealous this is so feeble.
 
Hostile;1426739 said:
Here's the Reader's Digest of your stance so far in this thread.

You: We can do better than Julius.

Skeptics: Really, how?

You: The draft.

Skeptics: Who should we draft?

You: Someone, anyone. He'll be better.

Skeptics: How will he be better? What guarantees?

You: You sure are loyal to mediocrity. :lmao2:

Skeptics: Do you have a plan or not? Let us hear your great plan.

You: I can't give you a roll call of all the RBs available.

Skeptics: We didn't ask for a roll call. We asked for you to demonstrate how you would improve on what we already have.

You: Well, I tried.

Skeptics: Where?

You: I'm done explaining myself. :lmao2:

Skeptics: When did you evere explain anything?

You: There's just no pleasing you. Did you buy a Julius jersey that's now worthless? :lmao2:

Skeptics: We're still waiting for you to add something of substance.

You: Large!!! I said that exact thing.





I am still waiting for you to show you have even an inkling of an idea how to have a discussion. All I see is a lot of pissing and moaning and nothing of substance at all.


You forgot 'Make it a great day' at the end.
 
Hostile;1426746 said:
That's just it Profit, not one of us has defended Julius Jones. We've simply asked you, philo, or bigbadroy to lay out a plan of attack to improve and none of you can.

Impotence is jealous this is so feeble.
get ray rice by any means necessary next year. hows that plan hos?
 
Crown Royal;1426749 said:
You forgot 'Make it a great day' at the end.
Also, there should have been infinitely more LOL's, and if possible, references to Julius' supporters being Q-backers.

But still, a fantastic summary. Make it a great day, Hostile.
 
Jarv;1426737 said:
:rolleyes:

If one guy logs into 2 different computers on different subnets with 2 different user names, does this mean he is actually 2 people ?

Well it looks as if this post has been hijacked to the gutter with false BS like you've posted above. Your hypothesis is wrong and insulting.
So much for your saying on your sig that says something about "being nice and getting along", huh guy?
 
bigbadroy;1426750 said:
get ray rice by any means necessary next year. hows that plan hos?
Not down with the by any means stuff, but I'd love to have him...if he declares. No guarantee he will.
 
TheProphet;1426755 said:
Well it looks as if this post has been hijacked to the gutter with false BS like you've posted above. Your hypothesis is wrong and insulting.
So much for your saying on your sig that says something about "being nice and getting along", huh guy?

Funny how any threads you and your 'brother' are involved in turn into clueless, pointless arguments?

What are the odds?
 
Crown Royal;1426749 said:
You forgot 'Make it a great day' at the end.

DallasEast;1426752 said:
And 'brother'.

superpunk;1426754 said:
Also, there should have been infinitely more LOL's, and if possible, references to Julius' supporters being Q-backers.

But still, a fantastic summary. Make it a great day, Hostile.
:bang2:

Damn, I was too brief yet again.
 
Hostile;1426757 said:
Not down with the by any means stuff, but I'd love to have him...if he declares. No guarantee he will.
:laugh2: how about "at whatever cost"?
 
TheProphet;1426755 said:
Well it looks as if this post has been hijacked to the gutter with false BS like you've posted above. Your hypothesis is wrong and insulting.
So much for your saying on your sig that says something about "being nice and getting along", huh guy?

I am nice and get along with everyone. Sounds like someone is getting upset when I ask you to expound on the subject you started ???

If I asked if "when a tree falls in a forest and nobody is there to hear it, does it make a sound".

Would you reply that I insuated that you cut down the tree ? Your paranoia on the subject seems a little extreme. Why do you think I'm talking about you ?

Have a nice day :)
 
Crown Royal;1426749 said:
You forgot 'Make it a great day' at the end.

DallasEast;1426752 said:
And 'brother'.

superpunk;1426754 said:
Also, there should have been infinitely more LOL's, and if possible, references to Julius' supporters being Q-backers.

But still, a fantastic summary. Make it a great day, Hostile.

Hostile;1426760 said:
:bang2:

Damn, I was too brief yet again.

Dont forget to scream out Ricky Rayyyyyyyyyyyy at the end .......
 
I will say it again, this prophet guy had mutliple egos and screen names that followed him around the old star telegram board. That is why i left there, he just over ran it. Himself and the screen name bowman which was also prophet, would start threads and then back his points up with his other screen name.

Then he would argue about it, just like he is doing now.
 
TheProphet;1426539 said:
Thanks, as always, for your thoughts. The chances of drafting someone with the minimum of JuJones skills seems pretty good to me as like I said, JuJones has not raised the bar very high. I'm willing to take the chance, and you are not. We therefore disagree. No big deal. Like I've stated repeatedly, I'm sick of waiting for JuJones' big breakout year. Maybe this upcoming season will prove me wrong, but I've based my opinion only on what I've seen on the field.
I hope we do draft a RB who has potential. It would be fun to compare notes with you at the end of next season if we did.

Is it not the offensive line who holds the bar? I don't know of any running back who is more than average with even a less than average line.It takes a SPECIAL back to make something out of nothing.Barry Sanders type players are not in every draft .Maybe this decade is the year for one,and maybe it will be this draft.My money is on one player and he won't be there , Julius and our first round and more won't get him.
 
superpunk;1426740 said:
IR vs. burmafrd

The Battle of Posters who refuse to use the quote function. ;) This should be unbelievably difficult to follow.

btw, IR, your above post (which I won't quote) illustrates the pointlessness of burm's request to PROVE someone can improve JJ's production. burm accepts that Peterson or Lynch could do so, with little resistance, so why can't someone just say "Kenny Irons"? They would be providing the same amount of evidence that the Peterson/Lynch theory is based on. None of those backs are guarantees to improve upon Julius' production.

But the fact is 27 rushers in the NFL last year matched or bettered Julius' 4.1 ypc mark. If that many people are doing it, how hard can it REALLY be to imagine that Julius' production could be replaced pretty easily? There's no guarantee, but if 27 people were as good or better last year, the probability that a replacement could AT LEAST match Julius' production is pretty high. PROVE that it isn't.

OK, don't....I just felt like demanding people satisfy my demands.

Atta boy Superpunk. Great analogy. Remember, unless we can PROVE any draft picks or trades will upgrade this team, then let's not change a thing. LOL.
If this logic was used in the transportation industry, buggy whips would still be the standard. I did not realize ole JuJones ranked 27th in the ypc mark. Not surprising. Heaven forbid we even mention replacing him if we can not PROVE his replacement will be the next ES. :lmao:
 
theebs;1426770 said:
I will say it again, this prophet guy had mutliple egos and screen names that followed him around the old star telegram board. That is why i left there, he just over ran it. Himself and the screen name bowman which was also prophet, would start threads and then back his points up with his other screen name.

Then he would argue about it, just like he is doing now.

Did he eventually get banned there?

I ask because I'm a sucker for happy endings

:pray2:
 
theebs;1426770 said:
Himself and the screen name bowman which was also prophet, would start threads and then back his points up with his other screen name.

But Phillo has already admitted to being Bowman ....... hmmmmmmmmmmm
 

Forum statistics

Threads
465,292
Messages
13,863,880
Members
23,788
Latest member
mattyice
Back
Top