theogt said:It's the triple reverse double lutz back hand-spring smokescreen. I saw it coming from a mile away.
Who knows. It could be information that they've had for awhile. Either way, as another poster pointed out, this isn't the first time it's been stated. Parcells has said it over and over again.Rack said:Rare. Rare indeed.
Kids, don't try that at home.
Or maybe a scout really did come right out and tell some radio station exactly what type of player Bill Parcells wants. What a way to keep your job!
theogt said:Who knows. It could be information that they've had for awhile. Either way, as another poster pointed out, this isn't the first time it's been stated. Parcells has said it over and over again.
[checks watch] ****, no.Rack said:I've never, before today, read or heard Parcells say "I want as many DeMarcus Wares that I can get my hands on".
That's not Parcells style. It would be giving a player too much praise.
Either way, it can be defined many different ways and it doesn't really narrow down the list much. It takes Greenway and Sims off the list. But as far as "the three", doesn't change anything. They can all get after the passer.
Is it saturday yet?
InmanRoshi said:Bob Sturm was just on KTCK, and he said he talked to a Cowboys Scout and he said Parcells wants an up the field pass rusher from the LB spot. He doesn’t want a “complement” to Ware, he wants as many Demarcus Wares as he can get his hands on. He wants to relentlessly attack opposing QB’s.
He went on to say that Carpenter doesn't really seem to be that type in his opinion. He gets the feeling they like Lawson alot.
Rack said:I've never, before today, read or heard Parcells say "I want as many DeMarcus Wares that I can get my hands on".
Alexander said:That really just doesn't sound like him.
Now if he said "Look, I plan to go to Texaco and buy as many of the player as I can, okay?", then it would be more credible.
At any rate, that was more this Sturm fellow than the scout. That is if this scout actually spilled the beans. I believe Coach Parcells would have this person fired if they truly leaked information.
Same type as Emmons or Porter?Alexander said:I think all of you are overstating this.
Pittsburgh doesn't have two "pass rushing" linebackers these days.
Joey Porter is the rusher. Carlos Emmons was the jack of all trades who could blitz, but his forte is coverage. Then they plugged in Clark Haggans, who is the same type of player.
VoR said:Same type as Emmons or Porter?
Haggans is a Porter type, hence the 9 sacks.
here's the depth chart by the way:
http://www.nfl.com/teams/depthcharts/PIT
Haggans and Porter were both defensive ends in college. I have links to Colorado State to prove it, in fact they started on opposite ends on the D-Line playing together.Rack said:Sorry, but Haggans is more like Clemmons. Just cuz he got 9 sacks doesn't mean he's the same type of pass rusher as Porter.
VoR said:Haggans and Porter were both defensive ends in college. I have links to Colorado State to prove it, in fact they started on opposite ends on the D-Line playing together.
Both are around 250.
And who says Lawson can't cover just because he can rush?
VoR said:Clark Haggans
College Career
Played defensive end in college after walking-on as a freshman…is physical and aggressive…has very good lateral quickness and agility…is a productive and tenacious pass rusher…is Colorado State's all-time sacks leader…finished 1999 with 87 tackles, 14 tackles for losses and eight sacks…registered 66 tackles, including 14 tackles for losses and 11 sacks as a junior…started every game and recorded 66 tackles (16 for losses) and 11 sacks in 1997…registered 43 tackles, 10 stops for losses and three sacks in 1996…redshirted as a walk-on in 1995…majored in art.
http://www.nflplayers.com/players/player.aspx?id=28888
Maybe not as good, not shabby whatsoever.Rack said:Wow. What does the position they played in college have to do with the player they are now?
And where the hell did the Lawson question come from?
Haggans is a solid all around 3-4 OLB. He's not as good of a pass rusher as Porter.
Rack said:Wow. What does the position they played in college have to do with the player they are now?
And where the hell did the Lawson question come from?
Haggans is a solid all around 3-4 OLB. He's not as good of a pass rusher as Porter.
VoR said:Maybe not as good, not shabby whatsoever.
The Lawson question came from what this post was originally answering as to not having 2 rush OLB's.
Answering, of course, the posts by people claiming Haggans is not a rush LB and that you can't have 2 of those types or 2 former DE's ala' Lawson.
Or in fact, the people who think Lawson won't be drafted will be very disappointed if he is .Alexander said:And because both were college DEs, it makes Lawson all that much more likely.
I would think you understand this completely by now. It is in the cards, the stars are aligned and the Chosen One will be a Cowboy.
There are going to be some very disappointed fans around here if Lawson doesn't get drafted by the Cowboys, because many of you have devoted a serious amount of time and energy finding reasons why you believe he will.
VoR said:Maybe not as good, not shabby whatsoever.
The Lawson question came from what this post was originally answering as to not having 2 rush OLB's.
Answering, of course, the posts by people claiming Haggans is not a rush LB and that you can't have 2 of those types or 2 former DE's ala' Lawson.