cobra
Salty *******
- Messages
- 3,134
- Reaction score
- 0
tyke1doe;1565183 said:I think there was a great deal of public resentment towards the "Enron boys."
And there won't be against some guy who was purportedly electrocuting dogs? The Enron thing was indecipherable to most jurors, so they couldn't get a strong moral response because there was a veneer of legality to their actions. Vick's acts are much more obvious and easily assimilated to people's extant moral views. Animal cruelty--and specifically cruelty to dogs--is something that almost causes universal cringes.
The jury will dislike Vick for killing dogs much more than Lay and Skilling because, unlike the Enron thing, they actually can emotionally grasp what Vick was doing. Count on it.
tyke1doe;1565183 said:That may be true, but it depends on the jury makeup. This case will be tried in Richmond. And while race has nothing to do with the indictment, I can guarantee you that Billy Martin is going to try to pack the jury with a majority of blacks, who may look at this case a bit different than whites, especially if they're of a lower certain socio-economic status.
This is why federal court yet again works against him. If he was in state court out in rural Virginia, he'd have a jury pool that consisted of hicks and his people. But the jury pool is federal court is much, much broader because it pulls from the entire district instead of a county. So without fail, juries in federal court tend to be better educated, more affluent, and more prosecutor friendly. This is one of the reasons that federal prosecutors are so successful.
And if Billy Martin tries to fill the pool with poor blacks as you suggest and striking white people because they are white, you can bet we will see some interesting Batson challenges.
The composition jury will benefit the prosecutor. You can count on that.