Latest Dez Video rumors from twitterverse...Terez Owens interview recap Post #230

Status
Not open for further replies.
This from the guy who claimed "Nobody believes that six-month bs."

Done with you dude. I'm thinking you wouldn't care if did anything illegal or not.

Explain how the link that you posted proves that he's been working on it for 6 months?
 
Looking into a rumor, versus bragging about looking into an incriminating rumor about a specific player, are two different things.
You don't seem to understand what is needed for a libel lawsuit, especially one against a public figure.

If Schefter or Florio say "we have seen the video and we've seen Bryant beat up and rape 12 puppies at gunpoint", then Bryant has a legit lawsuit.

If Schefter or Florio say "there's this rumor out here, we're looking into it, a video exists but we have no idea what is on it or if it will ever be released" then there is absolutely no grounds for suit in that statement whatsoever.
 
If there truly is nothing to this, that means some serious NFL reporters have been duped, and they'll turn their entire angst toward these sources and rumor mongers and tear them to shreds.

Somebody's going to get it in the end.
 
You don't seem to understand what is needed for a libel lawsuit, especially one against a public figure.

If Schefter or Florio say "we have seen the video and we've seen Bryant beat up and rape 12 puppies at gunpoint", then Bryant has a legit lawsuit.

If Schefter or Florio say "there's this rumor out here, we're looking into it, a video exists but we have no idea what is on it or if it will ever be released" then there is absolutely no grounds for suit in that statement whatsoever.

And he talks about "Amateur Hour" to others.
Chilling.
 
The only reason I'm not dismissing this story outright is Schefter's work on it. He's a respected media guy with solid credentials. However, if he's been snooping around this story since September and still hasn't uncovered anything he feels comfortable reporting, it casts serious doubt on how incriminating this evidence really is.

Agreed 100%.
 
This from the guy who claimed "Nobody believes that six-month bs."

Done with you dude. I'm thinking you wouldn't care if did anything illegal or not.

So "I'm hearing there's a tape of dez" and "there's a Dez tape" sounds the same to you?
 
But that is obviously proof that he has been working on it for 6 months. I mean he says so himself.

I have been working on a bid for DHS for year, it was due Jan 2014, it got pushed to may then sept then may of 2015 I have total of maybe 3 months work collectively in it but I guess I can say I have been working on it for 16 months. I mean I have had correspondence with individuals at DHS this whole time so I will use it :thumbup:
 
You don't seem to understand what is needed for a libel lawsuit, especially one against a public figure.

If Schefter or Florio say "we have seen the video and we've seen Bryant beat up and rape 12 puppies at gunpoint", then Bryant has a legit lawsuit.

If Schefter or Florio say "there's this rumor out here, we're looking into it, a video exists but we have no idea what is on it or if it will ever be released" then there is absolutely no grounds for suit in that statement whatsoever.

I wasn't referring to proving libel. I was talking about the damage to their reputation that could be done by simply filing an pursuing a libel case. This would be high profile either way.
 
I have been working on a bid for DHS for year, it was due Jan 2014, it got pushed to may then sept then may of 2015 I have total of maybe 3 months work collectively in it but I guess I can say I have been working on it for 16 months. I mean I have had correspondence with individuals at DHS this whole time so I will use it :thumbup:

Don't you love that? I do a lot of military work, I can't remember one job in twenty years I didn't re-bid at least five times. Then we are all told we start a year behind schedule when the project does start.
 
Working on it since sept. Means known about it since sept. Yall actually think schefter is doing detective work solely on this for 6 months straight?! Lol
 
Explain how the link that you posted proves that he's been working on it for 6 months?

Carmen and Jurko: Is he doing something criminal? Can you talk about it?

Schefter: I’ll say this: I’ve been working on this since September.

Carmen and Jurko: Is it criminal?

Schefter: Like I said I’ve been working on it since September. There’s a lot involved.


September is the 9th month. Its almost March, which is the 3rd month. 9...10...11...12...1...2.....6 months.
 
I wasn't referring to proving libel. I was talking about the damage to their reputation that could be done by simply filing an pursuing a libel case. This would be high profile either way.

Being in journalism and what now has become speculative journalism bad sources and info goes with the territory, look at the UVA rape case, the Duke Lacrosse case.
 
Carmen and Jurko: Is he doing something criminal? Can you talk about it?

Schefter: I’ll say this: I’ve been working on this since September.

Carmen and Jurko: Is it criminal?

Schefter: Like I said I’ve been working on it since September. There’s a lot involved.


September is the 9th month. Its almost March, which is the 3rd month. 9...10...11...12...1...2.....6 months.

And still nothing to show anybody.
Why is this repeatedly ignored?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Staff online

  • Sarge
    Red, White and Brew...

Forum statistics

Threads
464,124
Messages
13,790,150
Members
23,772
Latest member
BAC2662
Back
Top