I'd give a 4th this, and a conditional 3rd next year if Peterson runs for 1600+ yards. LOL
Yeah, since we are in fantasy land id offer a 1st round pick but we get our pick back if peterson doesn't rush for 2500
AD is the best running back ever. He is not worth the contract or the compensation to trade for him though. Not with the way this team is currently built especially.
Why not 3000 and 25 TD's?
Better not give up a 2 & 3 for Adrian. Stupidity!
At this point it looks like their is a market for AD. Dallas will either have to pay more money to appease him or more picks to get him.
I didn't think there was any way a team would trade anything of value for him, but after the McCoy trade and the Lynch deal, things have changed.
If Dallas doesn't do it, Arizona will.
Let them, then. Foolish move.
I think you are underestimating AP. AZ has all of the pieces to make a legitimate push for the SB if they can add a true workhorse back that commands the respect that AP will. A second round pick won't have the same impact as AP.
I think you are underestimating AP. AZ has all of the pieces to make a legitimate push for the SB if they can add a true workhorse back that commands the respect that AP will. A second round pick won't have the same impact as AP.
All the pieces?
Who's their QB?
You don't overpay for a 30 year old RB.... Money wise or with draft picks.
You don't overpay for a 30 year old RB.... Moneywise or with draft picks.
Except him. He's different than anyone in the history of the game.
I agree that you don't overpay for a 30 year old running back. The question is what is overpaying? For a 30 year old Adrian Peterson with fresh legs from a season of rest then you pay what he is worth.
It's funny how people around here overvalue draft picks. They refuse the accept that the draft is a huge gamble regardless of round. How many running backs have been drafted in the last 10 years that didn't amount to jack squat? Most of them.
I love the well thought out response.
The problem I have is that we have a short window where Romo is going to be around at this level. The past drafts have shown that the overwealming majority of backs come into the league and end up being on a committee of average backs producing average results.
Let's also realize that 1000 yards is only 60 yards per game..
We also don't know that Gurly or even Gordon will be available when we pick, or if Dallas would even draft one of them at that slot. The FO is feeling pretty confident in themselves and they may get cute and wait for the back in the 2 or 3rd round.
Last year we had an identity to our offense. People knew we were going to run and we dared them to stop us. Most failed to stop us. I believe we lost that and won't have that this coming year with a running back committee which includes McFadden and a rookie. There are way to many ifs involved.
Adrian Peterson forces the defenses to account for him even if he isn't having a hall of fame year. He is a difference maker even if it's due to name and reputation alone. I worry about losing that running the ball down your throat mentality. I believe that having the defense stack the box to try and stop this attack opens up the passing game for Romo.
When I look back at past drafts I am not thrilled with the odds of finding a back who can allow us to have the same swagger our offense had with Murray. Especially in the short window we have to get a Super Bowl with Romo.
There are positions other than running back that you can use draft picks on.
AP, Hardy, and maybe Vick as a backup QB.
Hide the women, children, and pets.