My point was Dak was part of the offense. The failure of the offense in each of those games whether it was misfires, miscues, ineptitude etc. is on the offense which Dak is a large part of. I watched all those games if the offense could have gotten out of its own way they would not have been close or tied games. Yes the Defense can shoulder the blame for giving up points, but the Offense has to shoulder the blame of leaving points on the field in the 1st half.
your point as you stated was that the offense was slow to start, the team fell behind and couldn't win the game as a result. now you are saying something different than what you originally said. so are you backtracking what you said and now following another line of reasoning (in your own mind)?. then I can address that too if that's the case. given how many points we scored in each of those games.
and let me ask you is your expectations that the offense scores every time? is that definition of leaving points on the field? how often should the offense be scoring in your opinion? and I go back to the Zeke and Schultz fumbles. is that Dak's fault? you seem to equate those offensive miscues to Dak's not being able to run the offense. please explain....
is the defense giving up 4 TDs and a field goal with one stop in the first half acceptable. that's 31 points at half time. is your expectations for the offense to score 31 at the half?
every offense leaves points on the field. not every drive is successful. not every drive ends up even getting a first down. that's not a Dallas thing, its an NFL thing. including KC, Tampa, NO, GB...
but the defense giving up scores in 4 of 5 drives is giving up too many points on the field. what's your expectations of the defense and how often they should make a stop? third down percentage, etc.
lets get your opinion on both sides of the ball....