IMO #1: We won the game against one of the best teams, right? funny how people just want to fight for the sake of fighting
IMO #2: Dak is in a conservative system where the team (on offense) plays not to lose instead of to try and win; we haven't seen Dak chuck the ball down field because it invites inherent risks like interceptions; so Garrett and Linehan don't call for that often (and I dislike them quite a bit for many things, as you may may noticed)
on defense, the team has learned to fly to the ball and to me, that is like having a high-flying offense - the risk-reward is great - the Dallas D has a very good risk-reward ratio on defense (as seen in the NO game, for example, but they were already highly regarded); on offense, vanilla, the opposite of risk-taking...
...I have said in numerous threads that we need a Riley-type for OC next year; in that scenario, Dak will make mistakes and many in the 'zone will roast him for it; but then the team will have balance and the opponents won't be able to key on Zeke and stuff the box....and most important, Dak, being a highly intelligent player who studies, will learn and be a better QB for the mistakes that he makes
...for now, while the offensive ineptness drives me absolutely crazy, I only put a portion of that on Dak...he hasn't learned to take chances yet because his coaches won't let him and that is why, for example, that you see the pass to Gallup that was a TD for an experienced QB sail over his head...disappointing and partially on Dak...but c'mon, 24 of 28 in this game is impressive for any QB...they left points on the field but in effect, forced NO to NOT score in their opportunities - they played to not lose and in this case, they won