No one fits a first rounder in my opinion and certainly not Davis who I spoke about earlier. The original article posted mentioned Davis among names and I thought he would be an interesting option to explore but no way for a first. I don't think guys like Miller, Forte, Michael or Mason are either. I think we have to roll with the current crew, keep watching and wait and see what turns up once training camp and cuts start happening.
I know Jones threw out that they would consider trading a first rounder for a player that could help immediately...but does that player need to be an RB?
You know..
No one fits a first rounder in my opinion and certainly not Davis who I spoke about earlier. The original article posted mentioned Davis among names and I thought he would be an interesting option to explore but no way for a first. I don't think guys like Miller, Forte, Michael or Mason are either. I think we have to roll with the current crew, keep watching and wait and see what turns up once training camp and cuts start happening.
I know Jones threw out that they would consider trading a first rounder for a player that could help immediately...but does that player need to be an RB?
I don't want Forte but I do find it amusing that the people saying Forte and his 3.9 YPC is total garbage(along with he is past his prime and has lost a step) are some of the same posters that have no problem with McFadden and his 3.3 YPC.
Just a observation I noticed going through these 12 pages.
No one fits a first rounder in my opinion and certainly not Davis who I spoke about earlier. The original article posted mentioned Davis among names and I thought he would be an interesting option to explore but no way for a first. I don't think guys like Miller, Forte, Michael or Mason are either. I think we have to roll with the current crew, keep watching and wait and see what turns up once training camp and cuts start happening.
I know Jones threw out that they would consider trading a first rounder for a player that could help immediately...but does that player need to be an RB?
I would think its a fishing expedition for sire.
No one fits a first rounder in my opinion and certainly not Davis who I spoke about earlier. The original article posted mentioned Davis among names and I thought he would be an interesting option to explore but no way for a first. I don't think guys like Miller, Forte, Michael or Mason are either. I think we have to roll with the current crew, keep watching and wait and see what turns up once training camp and cuts start happening.
I know Jones threw out that they would consider trading a first rounder for a player that could help immediately...but does that player need to be an RB?
I'm of the opinion that its a Fish Expedition comment for a team to step up and consider a trade.
Clearly..RB was ignored conspicuously in the draft much to all amazement.
This to me means somewhere, Dallas had had conversations with some team for a RB.
Could be they are waiting for the June cuts..?
Don't know.
But I sense there is something up and guys like Dunbar and Williams are on the bubble or possibly even trade bait in a deal.
We'll see.
I just don't see us sitting as Conference champs needing to improve and doing it without further addressing the Rb position.
Worst case for the offense is we end up with some injuries early to our RBs and we don't have a work horse guy and then Romo and the OL have to start throwing the ball instead of running it to move the chains..
I don't want to see that.
If Linehan has to reinvent the offense on the fly it's going to look like Detroit when Linehan had to throw so much there to be competitive.
And that's going to expose our OL a lot as they were not the best pass protectors.
They were good at running the ball..but I thought only average at pass protection.
So we'll see.