Bob Sacamano
Benched
- Messages
- 57,084
- Reaction score
- 3
FuzzyLumpkins;1983304 said:thats kind what im saying. im thinking that cowboys cannot be that stupid and show this much interest without checking on that knee.
lol, no kidding
FuzzyLumpkins;1983304 said:thats kind what im saying. im thinking that cowboys cannot be that stupid and show this much interest without checking on that knee.
FuzzyLumpkins;1983304 said:thats kind what im saying. im thinking that cowboys cannot be that stupid and show this much interest without checking on that knee.
How do you know that it can't be 100%? He had more trouble with it than a team would like, but they probably rushed him back to soon.TheCount;1983314 said:Then the question becomes how much do you commit to guy that has had two major knee surgeries?
Because no matter what the doctors see, and I'm sure they know this, that knee will never be 100 percent.
Do you sign this guy to a 5 year contract, which I'm sure is what he's after? From Javon's history, I doubt he's the type to sign a 1 year deal like Hamlin did.
Chocolate Lab;1982943 said:Talking about it on 103.3 right now... Says he just talked to some people at Valley Ranch and they say we still have high interest in Walker. He even puts it at a 70% chance that we sign him eventually.
FWIW.
zack;1983367 said:Why are people excited about this move? He isn't all that. I would rather draft a young WR..
NextGenBoys;1983025 said:Austin is fast. Thats it. There is really nothing more to him.
Where did you read he is developing nicely??? He cant run sharp routes, he cant catch very well, and doesnt have any agility or wiggle to him on kickoff returns.
I hope him and Hurd are cut and we bring in Walker and a 1st round draft pick.
dangerdoom;1983030 said:If someone gets cut, it's Austin and not Hurd. The only think Austin has going for him is that he can return kicks, but so can Stanback. As a WR, Hurd is a lot better than Austin. (People are forgetting those two TD drops Austin had in the Skins game.)
Oh yeah, and people are forgetting that Hurd is still only 22. Around the same age as the rookies in the draft. He still has a lot of time to develop.
FuzzyLumpkins;1983331 said:Knee injuries are problematic but really i would hope to think jones is being prudent here. This is taking some time and to me there is little question that both sides are interested. I am sure they are haggling over this very issue.
Hes only 27 years old so what a 3 year deal? Modest SB and a good roster bonus due Feb 1 of next year? i would think it would have to be something where the first year is a trial of sorts that pays him well after the trial or hes cut loose.
Multiple knee injuries in 2 years is VERY risky.
khiladi;1983513 said:Nobody is forgetting that Austin dropped two balls. Everybody who likes Austin admits he needs to work on his catching, but we also remember that he got clear separation on those two balls he dropped. He was wide-open....
Clove;1983417 said:I'd rather throw picks to get Fitz, or Roy.
That is what makes me wary of signing Walker to any long term deal. If we wait a year, ya gotta like .our chances of snagging Roy Williams in FA. Doubt we can do this if we extend TO have Walker on multi year deal and a high draft pick plus Crayton on the team.dbair1967;1983528 said:we all would...unfortunately it doesnt seem either team is interested though
takes two to tango, though we may can land Roy Williams in free agency next yr
David
windward;1983547 said:That is what makes me wary of signing Walker to any long term deal. If we wait a year, ya gotta like .our chances of snagging Roy Williams in FA. Doubt we can do this if we extend TO have Walker on multi year deal and a high draft pick plus Crayton on the team.
The more I think about it, the more I'm backing off Walker. Too risky, imo.
If it wasn't for thye knee issues then I would be all over this guy. I am just leery of signing a guywho could end up filling the d=same role Terry Glenn did last year. If we get him I'll hope for the best, but I do hope we draft a receiver in the first as insurance.dbair1967;1983555 said:I guess it depends on how healthy he is...he had a great 2006 and was off to another good start in 2007 before the knee flared up (17 catches, back to back 100 yd games to start)...
we could use another offensive playmaker, and if he's healthy he's probably the best chance we have to add one...the only other bitgtime skill player I could see them adding with a real chance to make a difference is McFadden, and he's a real long shot at bestin terms of us getting a chance to get him
David
Didn't you know? This board's doctors know better than the team doctors.Jaxonsdaddd;1983642 said:So If we do decide to sign him are we going to see a thousand posts saying, "I cant believe we are signing a WR with a bum knee"
Or will the approach be, we looked at the leg thoroughly and decided to value our doctors opinion more than that leathery rat coach in Denver? Or will he always be damaged goods to some here even after hes cleared?