SportsGuru80
CowboysYanksLakers
- Messages
- 8,728
- Reaction score
- 4,569
With Romo in a full season, McFadden would have had over 1,200 yards
1.So we should be 10-6 or better next year easily is that what your saying?1.A half decent back-up QB, better play calling and McFadden starting from week one and we would be at worst 10-6 and in the playoffs. Heck, even with Moore when Romo went down might have been enough. Some of you guys kill me, just hate giving a man his due if he's not your guy. Would Murray have done more in the same circumstances this year, maybe, pure speculation. It hasn't been the way it was last year and it has more to do with injuries than not having Demarco.
There are plays that Murray would get more yards than McFadden and visa versa. 2.May I remind you, if Murray doesn't fumble in the playoffs, the Cowboys could be defending SB champs right now.
Every one discounts the fact that Murray was a very strong back before we assembled the one year best O line in football.
I blame Garrett.
Oh wait, this isn't another bash Garrett thread? Oops my bad.
We didn't get a bargain. The FO got a bargain. Maybe folks are satisfied with McFadden's performance if your only concern is fantasy football, but McFadden simply does not bring what Murray brought last year. McFadden is much better than expected, but the running game is not the staple of our offense like it was last year. We were right in letting Murray go for 8 million a year, but we should have used that 3rd rounder to draft an rb and let that rb split carries with McFadden.
We didn't get a bargain. The FO got a bargain. Maybe folks are satisfied with McFadden's performance if your only concern is fantasy football, but McFadden simply does not bring what Murray brought last year. McFadden is much better than expected, but the running game is not the staple of our offense like it was last year. We were right in letting Murray go for 8 million a year, but we should have used that 3rd rounder to draft an rb and let that rb split carries with McFadden.
Ryan Mathews is simply a better player than Murray regardless of scheme.
We didn't get a bargain. The FO got a bargain. Maybe folks are satisfied with McFadden's performance if your only concern is fantasy football, but McFadden simply does not bring what Murray brought last year. McFadden is much better than expected, but the running game is not the staple of our offense like it was last year. We were right in letting Murray go for 8 million a year, but we should have used that 3rd rounder to draft an rb and let that rb split carries with McFadden.
Ryan Mathews is simply a better player than Murray regardless of scheme.
As of weeks end:
McFadden 208 rushes - 898 yards - 3 TD's.
Murry 176 rushes - 606 yards - 4TD's.
And Murry is the Eagles leading rusher and they benched him. Go figure.
How different would the totals be of McFadden got Randles carries to begin the season
Great observation post I feel the same way about the Murray situation he and Philly got what they paid for.Murray made his $$$ decision. That's his choice. He has to be dejected with 2 carries 3 yards despite any comment he/team may make to the contrary.
Always found him to be an articulate team guy. This one was about the money. That side paid off. The on field accomplishment didn't.
I'll be honest it doesn't mean much to me.
Murray in a Chip Kelly offense is a square peg in a round hole.
I suspect he would have ran for 1400-1500 for the Cowboys this year.
Oh well...
Well Eagles are on the hook for $13,000,000 to Murry if they cut him next year.