Medical literature on nerve regeneration statistics and J Smith

CalPolyTechnique said:
You find him intelligent. That's a poor reflection on you.
Click to expand...

Say what you want about Fuzzy, but he's a very bright dude. If you can't see that, it's not worth debating as far as I'm concerned. That doesn't mean I wouldn't understand if you or anybody else had a problem with him condescending to you in a debate. He's like TO dancing on your star. You want to make him stop, you have to beat him.

But then, you have to earn that. You can't just lose an exchange with him and then try to shift the debate to his character or his intelligence and hope nobody notices.
 
Idgit said:
Say what you want about Fuzzy, but he's a very bright dude. If you can't see that, it's not worth debating as far as I'm concerned. That doesn't mean I wouldn't understand if you or anybody else had a problem with him condescending to you in a debate. He's like TO dancing on your star. You want to make him stop, you have to beat him.

But then, you have to earn that. You can't just lose an exchange with him and then try to shift the debate to his character or his intelligence and hope nobody notices.
Click to expand...

Anyone that's had even a semester of postsecondary education can tell you he's blowhard. But again, if you're impressed with him it's a reflection on you and not something I'd hold against him.

I've debated him and seen others debate him and seen him pinned in the corner...dead wrong. Instead of admitting the obvious or acknowledging his error, he threatens you with "ignore," which is the message board version of putting the blanket over your head. I've got zero patience for intellectual dishonest posters and he's the chief offender.

As an aside, it would be disturbing if it wasn't so comical to see you constantly on an apologetic tour for him, thread after thread, sucked willfully into his cult of personality.
 
CalPolyTechnique said:
Anyone that's had even a semester of postsecondary education can tell you he's blowhard. But again, if you're impressed with him it's a reflection on you and not something I'd hold against him.

I've debated him and seen others debate him and seen him pinned in the corner...dead wrong. Instead of admitting the obvious or acknowledging his error, he threatens you with "ignore," which is the message board version of putting the blanket over your head. I've got zero patience for intellectual dishonest posters and he's the chief offender.

As an aside, it would be disturbing if it wasn't so comical to see you constantly on an apologetic tour for him, thread after thread, sucked willfully into his cult of personality.
Click to expand...

Agree to completely disagree with your assessment here, but as I said, not really interested in watching you try to support it, either.

The last time we got into a debate, remember it was you who ended up tucking his tail between his legs and 'taking the L.' If you want to start talking about credibility and what reflects on whom, again, I'd suggest you remember the context. We all have opinions. Having opinions is not the hard part. Having opinions and being proven right is the hard part.
 
dallasdave said:
Ok play" Detroit Rock City" to get you pumped up :laugh:
Click to expand...

Guys, lets not get another thread deleted...
Too bad there is no place to shoot the crap while talking football
BTB does not have the volume of people nor the notification features...
 
Idgit said:
Agree to completely disagree with your assessment here, but as I said, not really interested in watching you try to support it, either.

The last time we got into a debate, remember it was you who ended up tucking his tail between his legs and 'taking the L.' If you want to start talking about credibility and what reflects on whom, again, I'd suggest you remember the context. We all have opinions. Having opinions is not the hard part. Having opinions and being proven right is the hard part.
Click to expand...

Predictable heehawing from you.

If you remember the thread, then you'll remember where I admitted I was wrong. Plain and simple.

That's called being intellectually honest. I know that's a foreign concept to you, but it's a part of my personal constitution. What can I say? Clearly, we were raised differently.
 
Idgit said:
Say what you want about Fuzzy, but he's a very bright dude. If you can't see that, it's not worth debating as far as I'm concerned. That doesn't mean I wouldn't understand if you or anybody else had a problem with him condescending to you in a debate. He's like TO dancing on your star. You want to make him stop, you have to beat him.

But then, you have to earn that. You can't just lose an exchange with him and then try to shift the debate to his character or his intelligence and hope nobody notices.
Click to expand...

lol, i just realized that staff members probably cannot use the ignore function

it is too bad with some of these people.
and i like san luis obispo, actually just there on friday.
 
waldoputty said:
lol, i just realized that staff members probably cannot use the ignore function

it is too bad with some of these people.
and i like san luis obispo, actually just there on friday.
Click to expand...

Not singling out CPT, because he generally does a good job defending himself, too, but, yeah, not being able to put posters on ignore is a major drag.
 
CalPolyTechnique said:
Predictable heehawing from you.

If you remember the thread, then you'll remember where I admitted I was wrong. Plain and simple.

That's called being intellectually honest. I know that's a foreign concept to you, but it's a part of my personal constitution. What can I say? Clearly, we were raised differently.
Click to expand...

I didn't accuse you have being intellectually dishonest.

And since we're being honest here, you've got a long way to go before I'd let you question my intellectual honestly. The fact that you happen to think you're right when you're too often wrong--and posters don't agree with you because they know better--does not constitute intellectual dishonesty on their part. It just means they see things more clearly than you do.

But this is off-topic, so I'm going to let it drop here. Have the last condescending word if you want to, but then let's get back to the topic.
 
It's sad all we have to talk about with a high second round pick is nerve regeneration. Wish we would have drafted a healthy player that could be helping us right now.
 
Smith won't play this season can't imagine the team throwing him out there with no OTA's, training camp and missing most of the season. They're going to want him to have a full offseason with OTA's, training camp, preseason to give him a chance to have some success, if he can fully recover.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Staff online

Members online

... and 108 more.
Total: 8,110 (members: 208, guests: 7,902)

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
464,054
Messages
13,786,162
Members
23,771
Latest member
LandryHat
Back
Top