Dude, I've been reading this board dang near every day since the early 00's. I've also repped the Cowboys in roughly 30 states and 5 countries outside of the US. What do you mean I'm not a fan? Come on, you're better than that.
Having somebody in position to replace Dak would open up numerous possibilities to bolster the roster in areas of weakness. Folks complain about the defense, but it's weaknesses are a result of an unbalanced allocation of funds towards the offense. How do you correct this? By redistributing assets.
The quickest, most efficient way to do that would be to let Dak walk at the end of the season. It would be alot easier to do that if we had a guy on the roster that can step in and be a serviceable QB. Lance hasn't done that yet, therefore your statement is correct. Dak is the best option this year. I've never said otherwise, nor have I said that Lance should start over Dak at any point, and I challenge you to prove me wrong.
Unless Dak can prove he can do it without Lamb, we're looking at alot of money being tied into an offense that has failed at the worst of times. Is it so difficult to understand why somebody would entertain the thought of reorganizing the roster after 8 years of failure? How about 29 years? I want Dak and this team to succeed as much as you, or anyone else on this board. I just don't think it will happen, and I'm offering my thoughts on how this team could effectively move forward with a new QB.