- Messages
- 102,786
- Reaction score
- 115,396
Would rather go DE with 2 of the top 3 picks.
theres no team i hate more than the giants.. and it will always be that way.. you can say im defending them if you want thats fine if thats how you see it.. but im definitely keeping it real with myself..
usually teams that do what the giants did on defense doesnt work.. but in their first year they were able to drastically change their defense and it became a strength of their team and not a weakness.
Being a cowboys fan and giants being a rival shouldnt mean i have to not speak the truth just because they are a team I hate.. I choose logic..
You need to back up and look at the thread topic. We are talking about free agency. The Giants invested a great deal through free agency last season. The Cowboys didn't do that. The Cowboys and Giants live under the salary cap but they do it two different ways.Look at all the $$ the Cowboys paid out, and they didn't win a playoff game either.
Then we'll end up *****ing for another year about these QBs running roughshod on the defense. Pass rusher and LT are about equal, right behind QBs for most valuable positions. The other positions really aren't close as CB is probably a fairly distant 4th. It's also a position that transfers to other systems extremely well and probably better than any other position. If they choose not to pay to bring in Ingram or even JPP, this teams method is flawed.
You need that but you aren't getting that in this years draft.I really hope they dont. This is one of the years Dallas has to take the draft serious if they want a SB ring. The poking and hoping method isnt working. You need someone to get to the qb, or take double coverage so one of our other people on the team can do it. Someone has to get there.
Extreme hyperbole much? Did we just go 8-8 with one of the worst D's in the league, or was it 13-3 with a D top 5 in scoring?
Subtract Jack Crawford and Ryan Davis and add Demarcus Ware, Charles Tapper, and a 1st/2nd round pick and our D line should be just fine. Mortgaging the farm to guarantee $50+M to Melvin Ingram to get 8-10 sacks a year hardly seems like a bullet proof plan by the way...Since when did 18.5 sacks in 2 years became such an impressive total? Yeah it's much better than what we have, but throwing loads of $ at a problem hardly ever works.
Was that don't a typo, or are you insinuating signing Ingram will somehow stop the Cowboys from taking the draft seriously?
You need that but you aren't getting that in this years draft.
Ingram has been doing that, he has 18.5 sacks the last 2 yrs.
Extreme hyperbole much? Did we just go 8-8 with one of the worst D's in the league, or was it 13-3 with a D top 5 in scoring?
Subtract Jack Crawford and Ryan Davis and add Demarcus Ware, Charles Tapper, and a 1st/2nd round pick and our D line should be just fine. Mortgaging the farm to guarantee $50+M to Melvin Ingram to get 8-10 sacks a year hardly seems like a bullet proof plan by the way...Since when did 18.5 sacks in 2 years became such an impressive total? Yeah it's much better than what we have, but throwing loads of $ at a problem hardly ever works.
18.5 sacks is impressive. Especially any year you get double digit sacks.
There's no such thing. It's a unicorn for owners to hide behind when they don't want to tilt the profit margins past a certain point. Contracts can be structured and restructured in an infinite number of ways to make room for anything you want to do.
Mike Fisher talks about it all the time, and he's right on this.
Pass.
The guy had 950+ snaps this season and 8 sacks.
Not impressed.
Mayowa had 6 sacks in 350 snaps.
Addison or Sheard would be better values than Ingram.