summerisfunner said:
Coles and Moss are about equal in talent, you traded a good receiver for another good receiver
There is a flaw in this statement. It is suggesting pure talent is what determines how good a reciever is. If you've watched even a little football, you'll know that talent is only part of what makes a good or great player. Especially at reciever.
Coles averages more than Moss in receptions and yards, but less in ypc and touchdowns. Suggest to me that Moss is a bigger playmaker. In the last 3 years, a higher percentage of Moss' catches have been for first downs than Coles.
If you compare Moss' best season (2005), to Coles' best season (2002). Moss had more 100 yard games, more touchdowns, more yards, the same amount of catches, and a higher ypc.
The only two things Coles has on Moss, is he averages more catches and slightly less dropped passes a season. Beyond that, nothing. So how exactly are they both equal? Furthermore, which one would you say is better than Terry Glenn? Just one? Both? None?