SkinsHokieFan
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 2,469
- Reaction score
- 240
Fair enough reply
I still disagree however because leadership begins at the top and someone has to set the tone for the organization. If you are talking X's and O's, I sure do see your point, however if you have ever played a down of organized football, you realize that its far more then just X's and O's. If it was just X's and O's Norv Turner would be a HOF coach by now
I still disagree however because leadership begins at the top and someone has to set the tone for the organization. If you are talking X's and O's, I sure do see your point, however if you have ever played a down of organized football, you realize that its far more then just X's and O's. If it was just X's and O's Norv Turner would be a HOF coach by now
superpunk said:THEY can. THEY've won super bowls in their recent coaching stints (save Parcells, and I've already mentioned him on the overrated list). During Gibbs current tenure, he has done nothing that gives any indication that HE has anything to do with the play of the team. Williams is in control of the defense. When Gibbs was solely taking care of the offense, they were terrible. He gets some help, they get better. Now he needs even more help. Sorry, I don't see what Gibbs is doing that is so amazing. Those other coaches (except Jimmy) made their coordinators into what they are, and you can still see that influence today, as Parcells / Bellichick's coaching tree is one of the most successful in history. Gibbs doesn't have the same track record. I look at him like I look at Jimmy. Hell of a GM, and manager, but not much of an actual "coach."