Juke99
...Abbey someone
- Messages
- 22,279
- Reaction score
- 126
Cbz40 said:Most definitely
On the nosey, fellow Arthian....
Bring it on Sorgites!
Cbz40 said:Most definitely
blindzebra said:Funny what I remember was through TC and the first two preseason games last year Parcells was asked in every PC, if he was going to cut the struggling Romo to bring in a vet QB.
Darn, I must have just imagined that 'cause Romo was just lighting it up last year.
Banned_n_austin said:No sir. Romo looked better than Henson last year. And he didn't look lost. He still had that "moxie" that he's shown why Bill used that word.
Don't forget, Romo didn't start playing football until his Jr. year in High School. That's another reason he went to a small school. But he has never looked lost behing center.
My agenda is an abundance of wins for the Dallas Cowboys. The depth chart at QB is key to that agenda. At this point, it's pretty clear that Romo is the glimmer in Bill's eye ... Bledsoe is the twinkle ... Henson is an eye booger.
Fletch said:Also let me point out that this thread had nothing to do with Romo or the back up position. Rack made his own observation and then YOU came along (banned) and did what you and/or Nors always do... serve your agendas by making snide remarks in hopes you can start a flame war, completely hijacking the thread.
Worthless.
VACowboy said:Banned: Carter more talented than Henson? Don't make me laugh.
rw54 said:" That's why I think pedigree matters somewhat. It's a resource on which you can draw to see if they can answer the questions. It's by no means perfect, but it can be an aid.
Doomsday101 said:When the opportunity came as to who would play when Vinny went down it was Henson not Romo so this ideal that Tony was well ahead of Henson last year is BS. I like what I have seen out of Romo this off-season and he has shown improvement in his play. Giving Henson time just as Romo was afforded time I don't think is asking too much. With the reg season fast approaching I'm getting less concerned with all this bantering back and forth regarding 2nd and 3rd team QB's. Lastly I still don't get where you come up with Parcells thinks Henson is a clown those are your words not Parcells
Juke99 said:Well, I think the other burning question is, "Who's better Jim Sorgi or Tom Arth?"
I can't believe some people think Sorgi is the better of the two.
What imbeciles!
The Sorgites are friggin blind; they really are. They're agenda driven fools.
Banned_n_austin said:Romo earned the #2 spot his 2nd year ... and don't forget Romo didn't play football until his Jr. year in HS.
I think Henson will get the time to develop. But my guess is he'll be #3 this whole season, behind Romo. If he can develop from there fine, but he's got a lot of catching up to do IMHO.
He needs to make the improvement he should have made this year, next year ... he's behind, farther behind than some of you are capable of seeing. But he'll get a chance to develop.
blindzebra said:Funny what I remember was through TC and the first two preseason games last year Parcells was asked in every PC, if he was going to cut the struggling Romo to bring in a vet QB.
Darn, I must have just imagined that 'cause Romo was just lighting it up last year.
Martice said:I'm not sure how the pedigree label applies to DH or Romo. Can you explain a little further in detail. I'm sorry but I don't get it.
Thanks
Doomsday101 said:Well when the chance came to start someone other than Vinny aginst the Bears who played? Bill could have went to Romo if he was that far ahead of Henson as your suggesting but the facts are Henson was called apoun not Romo. I do agree at this stage Henson will be looking at the 3rd spot and the pressure will be on him to show improvement just as it was with Romo heading into this past off-season.
Doomsday101 said:Well when the chance came to start someone other than Vinny aginst the Bears who played? Bill could have went to Romo if he was that far ahead of Henson as your suggesting but the facts are Henson was called apoun not Romo. I do agree at this stage Henson will be looking at the 3rd spot and the pressure will be on him to show improvement just as it was with Romo heading into this past off-season.
rw54 said:I'm talking about stuff you are born with, the stuff that can only be improved upon not taught: Size, strength, speed, arm strength, intelligence, quickness of release. It doesn't always work but it is a helpful aid in determining probabilities.
Jarv said:Henson has been playing better since the beginnings of training camp.
Sorry you can't see it "with your own eyes"...But, maybe if you could read you would have seen the articles saying he has been improving.
But hey kid, thump your mighty chest and say your hate statements.
Like it was said earlier, some people want to say "I told you so" more than care about the developement of this team...You sonny boy are one of those.
From what I have seen with my eyes is that I would be starting Romo or Henson over Bledsoe right now. He's the one that has the deer in the headlights look. But he has experience which BP seems to desire at QB more than anything (see Vinny).
Spew your hate, because you can in this country thank god. I just totally disagree with your statements, which is my right and I have expressed my thoughts on your opinion.
Banned_n_austin said:I like Sorgi, Juke. I really do.
Banned_n_austin said:And who got yanked half-way through the game?
I just think at that point of the season, we were hanging on by a thread and Parcells was willing to lend Jerruh his ear and he gave in.
Then he turned around and went right back to his guns and put the "injured" Vinny Testaverde back in the game.
I see your point here, Dooms. But it doesn't mean much to me. If it did, we'd all be speculating that Henson would be the primary back up right now. He's not though.