CalPolyTechnique
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 27,686
- Reaction score
- 44,617
Mark has been apologetic about losing Chandler but he's also been somewhat short of saying he'd have matched the Knicks deal.
He got him back then let him walk again.
Chandler got wayyy too much credit for that title run and he's been on nothing but bad teams outside his Mavs stretches this past 7-8 years.
But beyond Tyson no one else on that team was even arguably worth keeping.
They left for ridiculously overpaid deals and mostly did zero away from the system.
But the biggest thing is the Mavs never had top 3 talent.
They won it with FAR less talent than Miami and arguably a couple other cities.
Mark offered everyone large 1 year deals to give it another shot but guys wanted ot cash in on the trophy with long term deals.
Same as Mark asked Parsons to opt in one more year at 16m.
Once guys decline he smartly moved on. Mark is fair but he isn't stupid.
Barnes' value will be determined by how he plays with the ball in his hands. That wasn't going to happen in GS.
But I promise you GS will miss Barnes and his athleticism as that very skilled team ages and needs more athletic defensive options.
Dallas was one of the oldest and most unathletic teams in basketball not long ago and they've taken to addressing that. Barnes definitely does so.
It was far from desperation. Dallas could have locked up Parsons had they wanted to but his knee and lifestyle are very real concerns.
This kid is 24. Curry didn't top 19 points or 6 assist per game until he turned 24. Is Barnes likely to be Curry? Of course not but you don't generally see these kids play well until they are mid 20s.
Kobe was in his 4th NBA season when he first topped 20 PPG. Barnes has had 4 thus far.
As he becomes a 2nd or 3rd option on the floor expect him to blossom.
A bigger issue with him is he's highly inconsistent and doesn't have a true scorer's mentality; he's not a guy that can create his own shot which is a quality every top scorer has.