NBA Playoffs thread

Manwiththeplan

Well-Known Member
Messages
14,268
Reaction score
7,763
a) I coupled it with his whole "the decision" comments WELL BEFORE his most down moment
b) based on what he has, he gives actually very little. I know people that give almost everything they are able.

Again, you have that right, and I'm pretty sure you only associate with Saints that live in poverty so others can be comfortable. Too bad you don't give Lebron James the same benefit of the doubt that you give to a guy like Donald Sterling
 

Manwiththeplan

Well-Known Member
Messages
14,268
Reaction score
7,763
It's a combination of everything he's done or said, plus his lack of humility, IMO. He may be the best in the game at the present time, but he'll never be loved by everyone the way Magic was, or Jordan was, or others.

http://espn.go.com/nba/playoffs/2014/story/_/id/11045954/lebron-james-never-beloved

Again, Jordan was not loved by everyone. Almost universally loved by fans of my generation, but he was disliked plenty as well, just not to the extent that Lebron is.
 

Manwiththeplan

Well-Known Member
Messages
14,268
Reaction score
7,763
would totally be on board with you except for

"They have the same personal problems they had today."

IMO, he's right. Anyone who dedicates the amount of hate to someone they haven't met and simply over basketball, is obviously empty inside. And I'm not referring to people who simply root against him. Some fans are consumed with hatred for him, and to those fans, he's absolutely right.
 

65fastback2plus2

Well-Known Member
Messages
6,788
Reaction score
6,652
Again, you have that right, and I'm pretty sure you only associate with Saints that live in poverty so others can be comfortable. Too bad you don't give Lebron James the same benefit of the doubt that you give to a guy like Donald Sterling

For one, Donald publicly apologized. Ive never heard lebron say he's sorry for his poor attitude? If he has, I'll gladly change my position.
 

khiladi

Well-Known Member
Messages
36,965
Reaction score
37,488
Again, not my point and not what I was saying. I was saying Jordan had no one to stop him from winning 6, because he was that much better than his 90s rivals, and the way the NBA is looking now, it looks like Lebron will have an opportunity to accomplish something similar, because I don't see any team that will be able to challenge them going forward, unless OKC or LAC can add another star player.

Nobody could stop Jordan because he was just that much better than anybody else. He was facing guys like Ewing and Olajuwan, Shaquille O'Neal, Karl Malone and John Stockton. I mean, the list goes on who he had to go play against, and these were guys that were hitting their prime.

The fact that you compare the Eastern conference of Lebron to Jordan's Eastern conference is laughable. Miami Heat has trouble with big men, and Lebron has to face guys like Hibbert, who goes for stretches of zero to two point games. Lebron hasn't faced D Rose in three years with his stacked Miami roster, had no Brooks to play against, an aging Brooklyn (and your comparing them to Detroit LOL) and a hurt Al Jefferson just this year. Hell, Lebron bouncing right at the time D Rose was making his ascent before the injury couldn't have come at a better time.

This is also the era of free agency, where teams can collect big players, just like in football. In the 80s teams had to develop their dynasties, while now, it's just paid for.

First off, Allen Iverson and the 76ers weren't relevant during Lebron's Cleveland tenure. Maybe his rookie year, but his accomplishment is irrelevant. Second, Dwight had a much better supporting cast. How many teammates did Lebron have that averaged 15+ppg? 1. What about Dwight? 3. How many teammates did Lebron have that averaged 4+ apg? 1. What about Dwight? 3. How many teammates did Lebron have that averaged more than 1 spg? 1 (same guy for all 3 BTW). What about Dwight? 4. Rebounds and Blocks were the only categories that Cleveland's supporting cast excelled in vs Orlando's.

How is it not relevant when Iverson was playing in the same decade and era as Lebron and the players were essentially the same? That's utterly asinine. Who was Lebron playing against in the Eastern conference? Who did Iverson have? Who did Dwight have? And it's utterly asinine to say all Orlando was topped in by Cleveland was rebounds and blocks. That indicates that Cleveland had a better inside presence, which they did and it substantiates that Cleveland was getting more opportunities. When Dwight left, just like when Lebron left, you see the clear effect of his departure on the franchise. Orland was starting the same three players.

This has already been debunked, Lebron's career ppg or higher in the playoffs

When you negate two years of not making the play-offs, going from 21 to 29, it drops. When you compare it to Jordan, it's not even close.

Rodman had yet to take off in 91'. It was his first full season starting and he put up 8ppg and 12.5rpg. Very good numbers, but not HOF numbers. Next year (at this point Isiah and Lambieer were done) Rodman put up his first of seven consecutive seasons of 14.9 rpg or better (18.7 to be exact).

LOL, Rodman wasn't the superstar in a traditional sense. He was never known as a scorer and 12.5 was legitimate rebounding numbers for a rookie, and playing small forward at the time, and that era. And Rodman didn't just provide numbers, he was all over the place and provided plenty of defense. Rodman was the best defensive player in the game by 1989 and won the defensive player of the year that very year. He was on NBA's first team All-defensive team from 89 to 1993, when he next placed second and back to first. His impact was felt their very second championship team. In 1991-92, he got 18 rebounds. I don't know what your talking about when you say Rodman had not yet taken off. The guy was one of, if not the most dominant defensive player in the game by 91.

And the very first year Jordan went to the finals, they had beaten Detroit 3 times out of their four game series, meaning the Bulls established themselves by taking it from them. They were the third best team record wise, the second best the Celtics and the Bulls first. The Celtics had 56 wins, with Detroit at 50. And Detroit beat the Celtics in the playoffs 4-2 to go meet the Bulls. During the regular season, they split the series with Boston 2-2. They pretty much had all their starting five outside of Mahorn who was replaced as the starter by Rodman who was killing it and lost to the Bulls.

Constant improvements in their records? In 1989, they won 63 games, In 1990, they won 59 games, in 1991, they won 50 games, how is that constant improvement? And Aguire didn't batter anyone, let alone Jordan and all of Bill Lambieer's number dropped/

LOL, I was talking about Detroit when Jordan finally beat them. They were making constant improvements as a general trend when Jordan beat them. 52, 54, 63, 59, 50. That 50 win season was the year Jordan won and three of the losses of Detroit came at their hands in the regular season, two from the Celtics. And the Celtics they beat handily. Jordan took over.

.....So much to correct, for starters Jordan's dad died AFTER the 1993 finals against the suns....not the sonics. And how was 1996 Payton's peak? The next season he scored more points, 2 seasons after that he scored more points and dished more assists. Each of the next 6 seasons he grabbed more rebounds.
And that Sonics team was stacked? Is that really the word you want to go with?

Sorry, that was the Father's Day performance of Jordan in the finals.



As far as Payton, notice what I stated:

1996 was Gary Payton's peak in terms of overall performance. He had 231 steals. In fact, it was Payton that Karl shifted to Jordan in game 3, which made Jordan put up his lowest numbers ever in the finals, averaging around 26-27. That was also the finals his father was murdered so that also played into it. Payton that year had his best shooting percentage ever and one of his upper scoring games. That team was stacked. And please don't compare Griffith to Kemp, especially defensively. And Schremph was a three time all-star and phenomenal.

Notice the emphasis on steals and defending Jordan in regards to Peyton. Notice also he was shooting his best percentage and one of his best seasons scoring wise. His steals dwarf anything he ever did afterwards.
 

khiladi

Well-Known Member
Messages
36,965
Reaction score
37,488
would totally be on board with you except for

"They have the same personal problems they had today."

And when the cramping happened, he was saying that nobody gets blamed like he does. It's pretty funny how in this context, he never mentioned the issue of how he mocked Dirk in the finals with Wade, and Dirk had to come out and say he couldn't believe how childish it was. When he gets a cramp, he's talking about being a victim. When he's the 'victim', it's all drama.
 

WPBCowboysFan

Well-Known Member
Messages
10,265
Reaction score
6,532
The spin in this thread in a futile attempt to negate how good Lebron is, is truly amazing. Simply amazing.

Its spin that even KJJ would be proud of. Volumes posted with great effort - yet still coming up to ZERO!

opti.gif
 

65fastback2plus2

Well-Known Member
Messages
6,788
Reaction score
6,652
And when the cramping happened, he was saying that nobody gets blamed like he does. It's pretty funny how in this context, he never mentioned the issue of how he mocked Dirk in the finals with Wade, and Dirk had to come out and say he couldn't believe how childish it was. When he gets a cramp, he's talking about being a victim. When he's the 'victim', it's all drama.

 

Manwiththeplan

Well-Known Member
Messages
14,268
Reaction score
7,763
Nobody could stop Jordan because he was just that much better than anybody else. He was facing guys like Ewing and Olajuwan, Shaquille O'Neal, Karl Malone and John Stockton. I mean, the list goes on who he had to go play against, and these were guys that were hitting their prime.

yea....I said that.....

The fact that you compare the Eastern conference of Lebron to Jordan's Eastern conference is laughable. Miami Heat has trouble with big men, and Lebron has to face guys like Hibbert, who goes for stretches of zero to two point games. Lebron hasn't faced D Rose in three years with his stacked Miami roster, had no Brooks to play against, an aging Brooklyn (and your comparing them to Detroit LOL) and a hurt Al Jefferson just this year. Hell, Lebron bouncing right at the time D Rose was making his ascent before the injury couldn't have come at a better time.

This is also the era of free agency, where teams can collect big players, just like in football. In the 80s teams had to develop their dynasties, while now, it's just paid for.

You clearly missed what I was saying, and after this, I'm not going to address this point anymore. I never knocked Jordan for his road to his championships (or for anything in this discussion), I'm simply saying with the way the Eastern Conference looks now, Lebron will have an opportunity to compete with Jordan and Magic for Championships won. He may not pass them, but he'll get several opportunities.

How is it not relevant when Iverson was playing in the same decade and era as Lebron and the players were essentially the same? That's utterly asinine. Who was Lebron playing against in the Eastern conference? Who did Iverson have? Who did Dwight have? And it's utterly asinine to say all Orlando was topped in by Cleveland was rebounds and blocks. That indicates that Cleveland had a better inside presence, which they did and it substantiates that Cleveland was getting more opportunities. When Dwight left, just like when Lebron left, you see the clear effect of his departure on the franchise. Orland was starting the same three players.

What players were essentially the same? AI went through Milwaukee, Toronto and Indiana to get to the finals. Check out the players on those teams and tell me they were the same as when Lebron went to the finals. A matter of fact, none of those teams were in the playoffs in 07' and only Toronto in 08'.

When you negate two years of not making the play-offs, going from 21 to 29, it drops. When you compare it to Jordan, it's not even close.

Sounds like Cherry picking to me....throw out his lowest ppg season and then claim his regular season ppg is lower than his playoff ppg. How about you compare his 2008 or 2009 regular season stats, to his 2008 or 2009 playoff stats, since you claimed he choked that year.

LOL, Rodman wasn't the superstar in a traditional sense. He was never known as a scorer and 12.5 was legitimate rebounding numbers for a rookie

Let's stop right there, 12.5 is legit rebounding numbers for anyone, but Rodman was not a rookie

and playing small forward at the time, and that era. And Rodman didn't just provide numbers, he was all over the place and provided plenty of defense. Rodman was the best defensive player in the game by 1989 and won the defensive player of the year that very year.

We can stop right here too. He won DPOY in 1990, not 89'.

He was on NBA's first team All-defensive team from 89 to 1993, when he next placed second and back to first. His impact was felt their very second championship team. In 1991-92, he got 18 rebounds. I don't know what your talking about when you say Rodman had not yet taken off. The guy was one of, if not the most dominant defensive player in the game by 91.

In the context of what you said, yes he had yet to take off. In 1991, he was an all star caliber player, not someone you would look at and think HOF.

They pretty much had all their starting five outside of Mahorn who was replaced as the starter by Rodman who was killing it and lost to the Bulls.

Rodman didn't replace Mahorn in the starting lineup. Rodman replace Aguire midway through 90'

LOL, I was talking about Detroit when Jordan finally beat them. They were making constant improvements as a general trend when Jordan beat them. 52, 54, 63, 59, 50. That 50 win season was the year Jordan won and three of the losses of Detroit came at their hands in the regular season, two from the Celtics. And the Celtics they beat handily. Jordan took over.

So how did Detroit improve every year, like you said, if they went from 63 wins, to 59 wins to 50?

As far as Payton, notice what I stated:

Notice the emphasis on steals and defending Jordan in regards to Peyton. Notice also he was shooting his best percentage and one of his best seasons scoring wise. His steals dwarf anything he ever did afterwards.

Yes, 1996 was a career high in steals, still would've been dumb to look at Payton in 96' and say he was a future HOFer.
 

dargonking999

DKRandom
Messages
12,578
Reaction score
2,057
So I hear there's a playoff game tonight? does anyone care about that?

Or are we gonna continue with this..." Lebron Sucks...no he doesn't, your a hater.... so I have good reason to hate him, he's not as good as XYZ.....so he's still a great player....yea welll he's not humble enough for me, so i'll continue to hate him....whatever imma continue to defend him...well im gonna continue to attack him"...conversation thats reached a pointless level?
 

StarBoyz83

Well-Known Member
Messages
17,434
Reaction score
11,978
I hate it but the spurs got this. The spurs are going to win the finals. But they deserve it! Its different than the miami vs dallas finals. The spurs are playing the way you need to win the finals. I wouldn't say they are for sure the better team but they are playing better as a team.
 

JoeyBoy718

Well-Known Member
Messages
12,715
Reaction score
12,709
Is this the best rivalry in 30 years? This is unbelievably competitive. And these two teams are certified dynasties. The Spurs have won 4 championships and made 6 Finals this century and the Heat have made 4 straight (made 5 total including the Wade/Shaq team) and are going for a 3-peat. And they're playing the heck out of each other. Last year was the first Finals I've ever seen where the team that won the series lost the series. Enjoy it while it lasts. This rivalry is going down in history.
 

Tabascocat

Dexternjack
Messages
27,784
Reaction score
38,828
CowboysZone DIEHARD Fan
Is this the best rivalry in 30 years? This is unbelievably competitive. And these two teams are certified dynasties. The Spurs have won 4 championships and made 6 Finals this century and the Heat have made 4 straight (made 5 total including the Wade/Shaq team) and are going for a 3-peat. And they're playing the heck out of each other. Last year was the first Finals I've ever seen where the team that won the series lost the series. Enjoy it while it lasts. This rivalry is going down in history.

I would say the Heat/Knicks around 2000 was a better rivalry.

Of the last 30 years, there are far better ones IMO. Pacers/Knicks(insert Spike Lee), CHI/DET, LAL/Boston just to name a few. This is just the latest rivalry, a good one brewing too.
 

JoeyBoy718

Well-Known Member
Messages
12,715
Reaction score
12,709
I would say the Heat/Knicks around 2000 was a better rivalry.

Of the last 30 years, there are far better ones IMO. Pacers/Knicks(insert Spike Lee), CHI/DET, LAL/Boston just to name a few. This is just the latest rivalry, a good one brewing too.

Well, in my opinion, I'd put this one over ones like Heat/Knicks, Pacers/Knicks, even Chi/Det because these teams are the two best teams in their respective conferences, they're playing for the world championship, they go down to the wire of game 7, they're both franchises in the midst of a dynasty (6 Finals and 4 titles for Spurs, 5 Finals and 2 titles for Heat), and the Hall of Fame legacies of many players (and coaches) hang in the balance.

Heat/Knicks might've been fun to watch, but those weren't championship teams. The Chi/Det rivalry was great and it was the stepping stone for Jordan, but it's hard to count that, in my opinion, because they played in the same conference and couldn't compete for a title. But I'd definitely put the LA/Bos rivalry(ies) ahead of any rivalries in the history of any sport.
 

Tabascocat

Dexternjack
Messages
27,784
Reaction score
38,828
CowboysZone DIEHARD Fan
Well, in my opinion, I'd put this one over ones like Heat/Knicks, Pacers/Knicks, even Chi/Det because these teams are the two best teams in their respective conferences, they're playing for the world championship, they go down to the wire of game 7, they're both franchises in the midst of a dynasty (6 Finals and 4 titles for Spurs, 5 Finals and 2 titles for Heat), and the Hall of Fame legacies of many players (and coaches) hang in the balance.

Heat/Knicks might've been fun to watch, but those weren't championship teams. The Chi/Det rivalry was great and it was the stepping stone for Jordan, but it's hard to count that, in my opinion, because they played in the same conference and couldn't compete for a title. But I'd definitely put the LA/Bos rivalry(ies) ahead of any rivalries in the history of any sport.

Good points, but rivalries aren't excluded to championship series. They are built on hate, envy and previous hard, fought games and fans play a large role in those. You can have two bottom dweller teams have a great rivalry, of course the past has to add some credit to that.

I just don't see it between the Heat and Spurs yet. They do fight and play hard, but is there animosity between them and/or the fans? IMO, no, not yet.
 
Top