No. I’m saying if we are winning with Dak as we were winning with Romo, Dak’s earned a contract. Winning is winning. And so far Dak has proven to win games. Especially in comeback situations. That was the barometer for Romo’s extension. So why change the criteria now?
The point which all of you people who cry about everything with this team wont even acknowledge is Dak is just as accurate and just as successful when they call plays that are similar to what Goff and Wince throw. But them playcalls are far apart and very few then there should be.You can all cry bad qb, but thats not really the case. How did Goff and Wince do when they were forced to play in a similar system as dak in their rookie yrs? Goff couldnt even get on the field because he cant pay under center, and Wince couldnt complete anything over 10 yrds. But none of you want to discuss that, and simply just say Dak sucks.Why what? You're just ignoring my point and going into yard totals. I feel like I've lost what your actual point is, I'm not the one arguing about Cooper's YAC (though in this case, given the small sample, it is an anomaly).
The difference between what Goff does and what Dak does is simple. Goff throws guys open, Dak waits until they get open. I don't care about YAC, specifically.
He throws them open all the time with anticipation.Goff had better receivers. He ain’t throwing them open. They run precise routes and have speed to take the top off the defense.
Look at what he brings to the team. We can find any athlete to run. I want a guy that can take it to the next level and be a passing threat as well. Our team is built to win right now with our solid run game and defense, regardless of our QB. The problem is the team is actually talking about paying the QB as if he's the big piece to the puzzle.Right now Dak is just as much a regular season winner as Romo was. Did you have an issue with Romo’s contract?
Look at what he brings to the team. We can find any athlete to run. I want a guy that can take it to the next level and be a passing threat as well. Our team is built to win right now with our solid run game and defense, regardless of our QB. The problem is the team is actually talking about paying the QB as if he's the big piece to the puzzle.
He could throw the ball...So what was the barometer for Romo?
The point which all of you people who cry about everything with this team wont even acknowledge is Dak is just as accurate and just as successful when they call plays that are similar to what Goff and Wince throw. But them playcalls are far apart and very few then there should be.You can all cry bad qb, but thats not really the case. How did Goff and Wince do when they were forced to play in a similar system as dak in their rookie yrs? Goff couldnt even get on the field because he cant pay under center, and Wince couldnt complete anything over 10 yrds. But none of you want to discuss that, and simply just say Dak sucks.
He throws them open all the time with anticipation.
Look how early in the routes these balls are thrown, particularly that last one. This is throwing receivers open 101. Dak has as much arm talent as anyone, but he does not see the field like this. He just doesn't. Contrast those Goff throws to this, which is about 3 steps too late, making an easy win a tough, contested catch:
Dak can be a good QB in the right system and with the right players around him. But acting like he has the passing ability of some of the league's elite QBs, including Goff, is totally baseless. He doesn't throw with any anticipation, he has to see it first. It's difficult to throw the ball down the field in this league without that trait, and it's where the Cowboys struggle every single week.
Please see the post below this one. Dak does not anticipate throws, so assuming he could do the same thing that other guys do is off.The point which all of you people who cry about everything with this team wont even acknowledge is Dak is just as accurate and just as successful when they call plays that are similar to what Goff and Wince throw. But them playcalls are far apart and very few then there should be.You can all cry bad qb, but thats not really the case. How did Goff and Wince do when they were forced to play in a similar system as dak in their rookie yrs? Goff couldnt even get on the field because he cant pay under center, and Wince couldnt complete anything over 10 yrds. But none of you want to discuss that, and simply just say Dak sucks.
I agree. But with Cooper and a reinvigorated Oline I see improvement. I’m optimistic about it.While you and I seem to agree on a lot, I'm a little shaky on using winning as a barometer with the winning not being consistent throughout. In terms of winning, Dak had a hugely successful first season, but in the last 27 games (2017 & 11/16 of 2018) he is 15-12, so the winning has only been slightly above .500 most of his career.
Yea. To the opposing defense.He could throw the ball...
Tim Tebow won games in his time and a playoff game, team released him shortly after. Winning is winning....Look Youngin.... It’s apparent that we couldn’t care less about the percentage of yards thrown or astronomical numbers in the passing game. What we Full Adults care about is a quarterback playing within the strengths of the team to produce wins. That’s all that matters to us. We didn’t grow up playing Madden and gambling on fantasy football. We didn’t grow up in an era that altered rules to favor the quarterback and receivers. We grew up in the smash mouth era of football when teams won by any means necessary. We care about wins and championships. Not numbers. So please excuse us for being optimistic when we see our quarterback contributing to a current 3 game winning streak. Even if he doesn’t rack up 500 yards per game. Winning is all that matters.
We aren’t talking about Tebow. Dak has contributed to many more wins than Tebow.Tim Tebow won games in his time and a playoff game, team released him shortly after. Winning is winning....
The great aikman won his share of games with more turnovers and less scores than the guy you hate.Yea. To the opposing defense.
I have argued that yes two passes have skewed peoples perception of Dak's play. I have given a statistical basis for that. 2 passes over 3 games amount to almost 20% of Dak's total yardage. That speaks to the outlier nature of the plays.
I have also given qualitative assessment. If you think Dak was playing well before those 2 plays then you don't understand qb play. If you think after those 2 plays that suddenly Dak had a good game then you shouldn't be evaluating qb play for public consumption
I have been completely consistent throughout this 20 page discussion.
What is truly amazing is that 20 pages into this discussion you're using a passer rating of 102 to defend a game played. When the entire premise of this thread and discussion.. . Sigh. . Yikes.
So you’re more of a talent evaluator than those in the organization? I trust them more than any of you.Look at what he brings to the team. We can find any athlete to run. I want a guy that can take it to the next level and be a passing threat as well. Our team is built to win right now with our solid run game and defense, regardless of our QB. The problem is the team is actually talking about paying the QB as if he's the big piece to the puzzle.
Like saying grossman contributed to more wins in his SB run, team carry. It is quite possible that's what's happening now with Dak.We aren’t talking about Tebow. Dak has contributed to many more wins than Tebow.
Romo didn’t have lesser teams. He threw the ball to Hall Of Famers.The great aikman won his share of games with more turnovers and less scores than the guy you hate.
The great dak has tried to throw his share of picks, has a bad habit of fumbling on his own, already has 4 pick 6s despite throwing checkdowns all game and has a great supporting team. But you hate on the guy that had lesser teams.
Good one.Yea. To the opposing defense.