NFC East top 10

[firehawk350]

:laugh2: :laugh2: :laugh2: OMG! What will be the next EXTREME thing out of your mouth?

I'll leave you chuckling into perpetuity in that case, because if you can't understand that basic concept, I can't help you.

 

[tomson75]

I'll leave you chuckling into perpetuity in that case, because if you can't understand that basic concept, I can't help you.

I'm fairly certain he understands your concept. It's the fact that you're analogy is completely ********. A pigeon? C'mon man. That's weak.

 

[firehawk350]

I'm fairly certain he understands your concept. It's the fact that you're analogy is completely ********. A pigeon? C'mon man. That's weak.

Does it really matter? Honestly??? Bad analogy or not, everyone gets the point. Small and fast is harder to hit then big and fast. Would a deer/antelope comparison be better for you? Then we'd have people crying that an antelope is much faster and Moss isn't that much faster then Owens... And on it goes...

 

[tomson75]

Does it really matter? Honestly??? Bad analogy or not, everyone gets the point. Small and fast is harder to hit then big and fast. Would a deer/antelope comparison be better for you? Then we'd have people crying that an antelope is much faster and Moss isn't that much faster then Owens... And on it goes...

Yes, it would. Actually, I just found it to be rather amusing. Nothing personal. However, I do think your concept, while theoretically sound, is a bit of a stretch as far as comparisons go.

 

[5Stars]

Does it really matter? Honestly??? Bad analogy or not, everyone gets the point. Small and fast is harder to hit then big and fast. Would a deer/antelope comparison be better for you? Then we'd have people crying that an antelope is much faster and Moss isn't that much faster then Owens... And on it goes...

OK...if you are right, tell me this? Shouldn't you guys be bashing the eagles instead of this...? Why fight? Our teams have the Lombardi?

(Sorry eagle fans)

Can a fish swim backwards?

 

[firehawk350]

Yes, it would. Actually, I just found it to be rather amusing. Nothing personal. However, I do think your concept, while theoretically sound, is a bit of a stretch as far as comparisons go.

That's part of my teaching style. I taught air force personnel the basics behind tactical air warfare and found that most of the physics properties we intuitively understand from experience doesn't translate really well in talking about aerodynamics, electronic warfare, etc... so I tend to overexaggerate using familiar concepts to get a basic idea across and from there, I can reign it in perspective.
Figuring, if you are on this board at this time of the year, you have a basic understanding of football, my point would be taken with the correct proportions knowing the difference is about 7 inches and .05 in the 40. So I didn't feel like I had to do that in this case.

 

[firehawk350]

OK...if you are right, tell me this? Shouldn't you guys be bashing the eagles instead of this...? Why fight? Our teams have the Lombardi?

(Sorry eagle fans)

Can a fish swim backwards?

No, it can't. What makes you think I don't bash the eagles anyways? I do, just not here as this is a cowboys fan board and I'm a Commanders fan.
Like being a chemist in a physics convention and talking about biology. It just doesn't make any sense.

 

[Chocolate Lab]

So Romo is penalized because he was good enough for Parcells, who loves controlling the ball and hates turnovers as much as any coach who ever lived, to trust enough to throw much of the time.

And Campbell is rewarded because he was so raw and shaky that his coach insisted he not throw as much, even though the team's star RB was hurt much of the year.

I love Skins "logic". :laugh2:

 

[5Stars]

Like being a chemist in a physics convention and talking about biology. It just doesn't make any sense.

Oh...? Now I get it! Talking about sheep and goats makes sense, huh?

I mean antolopes and deer..."It just doesn't make any sense"

:laugh2:

Damn, already forgot it!

No wonder the RedStinks are what they are...

 

[cobra]

Or maybe it's because throwing to Washington's receivers is pretty difficult.

Good God.

Are Commanders fans this stupid? Or are they just so homerific that they are led to make ignorant comments.

I point out Romo's completion percentage as compared to JC's pathetic completion percentage of barely 50%.

You come back with the fact that Commanders WRs are hard targets. Fine. Then how do you explain the fact that Brunell's completion percentage was 62.3%, 10 points higher than JC's? Seems to me that they were throwing to the same "hard targets."

So what's your next asinine excuse in your desperate attempt to make JC's piss poor play look no-so-piss-poor?

 

[dalboy]

i hate to say it but no way westbrook is better than portis.

 

[Cowboys&Caps]

What has Carpenter done to prove being on the all under 30 team of that list?

Marcus Washington isn't 30 yet....I'd have him on it over Carpenter.

a whole hell of a lot more than Landry..........

 

[Bob Sacamano]

Does it really matter? Honestly??? Bad analogy or not, everyone gets the point. Small and fast is harder to hit then big and fast. Would a deer/antelope comparison be better for you? Then we'd have people crying that an antelope is much faster and Moss isn't that much faster then Owens... And on it goes...

Romo had no problem hitting Terry Glenn

and if you looked at any QB's play in this league, deep-down, I'm sure you could find a nugget or 2, or even 3 or 4 for each of them

it's called reaching

 

[percyhoward]

I'm surprised at the love for Burress.

Anything he does to help you, he'll turn right around and do something stupid (or lazy) to hurt you. And to a greater degree than any other player I can think of, in any division.

 

[TEK2000]

Now I see why Campbell had such a hard time completing passes.

 

[Bob Sacamano]

Now I see why Campbell had such a hard time completing passes.

:laugh2: it looks much worse in live-speed

"oh ****, ball!"

 

[ScipioCowboy]

I'll leave you chuckling into perpetuity in that case, because if you can't understand that basic concept, I can't help you.

Actually, I think it's Commander fans who "can't understand" the underlying premises of this discussion:

1) Create an all-NFC East, under-30 team.

2) List the top 10 players in the NFC East.

Thus far, Commander fans have produced a litany of excuses for Campbell's suspect stats (receivers were too small, forced to throw the ball away, etc.), and absolutely no substantive reason for including him in any of the above categories.

 

[ScipioCowboy]

Ahh, so he was supposed to be a low risk bus driver why Romo was a gunslinger. That might explain why Romo's average ypc and overall yards are so much better. Ok, but how does that explain the fact that "gunslinger" Romo had a 65.3% completion percentage while "low risk" Campbell had a whopping 53.1% completion percentage. One would think that the low risk guy would have a much higher completion percentage. But by your own argument, the team wasn't asking him to do much, but he still could only complete barely 50% of his passes.

Campbell has terrible accuracy problems. Again, at this point he is basically Quincy Carter. Commanders are desperately believing that the problem will fix itself, but it's not a guarantee. Regardless, it's pretty piss poor that Campbell wasn't asked to do much but he still couldn't complete more than 53% of his passes (which puts about 65th in the league in accuracy behind even god awful Andrew Walter). Regardless of what the system is like, completion percentage is a pretty accurate indicator of individual ability.

Campbell is talented? How so? He was 2-5, a horrible accuracy/completion percentage, and averaged less than 200 yards per game.

See, this is further proof of how homerific Commanders are. They actually believe that you could look at what Romo did last year and what Campbell did last year and not see Romo as clearly better and more promising than Campbell.

All Campbell is right now is potential. But potential is not always realized. Quincy Carter never improved. Nor did Ryan Leaf. At least Romo can say he showed it at one point in time. Campbell has never shown the goods across an entire game. Yet Skins fans are certain there is no difference between the two.

Get real.

By their logic, we could reasonably place Pat McQuistan in the same tier as Chris Samuels.

 

[Jay]

This is the worst top 10 I've ever seen. End of story..

 

[Bob Sacamano]

This is the worst top 10 I've ever seen. End of story..

http://img144.*************/img144/6913/4543992761be8c9f91dba8.jpg