Reduction?
Who cares about reduction.
Read Lockharts inane comments:
“
The union has single-handedly turned back the clock and trampled on the rights of victims by saying it’s okay to commit violence against women as long as you’re provoked.”
At *no* time did the union say, infer or imply that.
They claimed that Elliott never assaulted Thompson in any way, shape or form.
That they had NUMEROUS witnesses that backed Elliott, including a Florida police officer and friends of Thompson.
Thompson had numerous witnesses she claimed would back her and only *one* of them did...her aunt. And her aunt only claims she saw some bruises on her thru a FaceTime chat.
They pointed out the constant lies that Thompson told that were proven from law enforcement and witnesses.
They showed a video, in the appeal hearing, of Thompson trying to smash the window of her own car to blame it on Elliott.
They showed how Lisa Friel, who you hired, withheld evidence from Kia Roberts (who you hired) and Roberts was the only person to interview Thompson.
They brought forth an expert witness that stated that you simply cannot tell a date from the color of the bruises with today's medicine and technology.
They questions YOUR medical experts who AGREED and admitted they did it anyway.
They showed how one of YOUR medical experts who LIED to get out of being deposed by claiming she was in the hospital when she never went to the hospital and was at home the entire time.
There were numerous witnesses that claimed they saw Thompson freaking out on Elliott, Elliott trying to get away from Thompson and never even touching her and that her friends who didn't know Elliott stated that they don't trust a word that Thompson says anymore.
I hope this idiot understands that this was all transcribed. Of course, he claimed the NFL was going to sue the NY Times for a CTE article where they quoted the league.
Good lord is their an environment of incompetence in the NFL offices.
YR