Nors consolidation and predictions!

[Waffle]

I don't know the all the background here, but I smell me some sour grapes.

 

[Hostile]

I don't know the all the background here, but I smell me some sour grapes.

Yeah you do. They weren't fermented either.

 

[Banned_n_austin]

I've never banned anyone for that. Not even you. You were banned for the language you were using. Excuse me, suspended.

Nope. Not the time I'm speaking of. No language involved ... but yes, suspended.

 

[Waffle]

Yeah you do. They weren't fermented either.

By the way, I thought your "Nors Credits" were pretty generous. I like how you mentioned him guessing SIX players for TWO spots. I like those odds too.

Here's the Nors pre-draft post that he wishes he could erase...

--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hostile
If both are there I bet they select Ware.


Book it Danno

NO WAY WE SELECT WARE OVER Merriman!

 

[Hostile]

Nope. Not the time I'm speaking of. No language involved ... but yes, suspended.

I've only banned you one time and it was for language.

 

[BrAinPaiNt]

Nope. Not the time I'm speaking of. No language involved ... but yes, suspended.

You need to clean out your PM box and PM when you have done so.

Thanks.

 

[Juke99]

this thread might be the silliest one I've ever read...

 

[dargonking999]

this thread might be the silliest one I've ever read...

aww your not ahving fun. I'm loving this fight between BNA and Hostile (in which hostile is clearing winning) and the battle between Hostile and Nors( in which once again Hostile is clearly leading)

 

[Nors]

BNA... Even though I'm one of the main culprits when it comes to doing battle with Nors, I do like the guy (in a purely heterosexual way so don't get any ideas!)...

He does though lose a point or two with me by putting BZ on ignore and not being man enough to get some of the stuff back he dishes out but it's not a perfect world is it?

What is it? I was banned for making a jovial reference to BZ. I was told to put him on ignore. I HAVE put him on ignore. I feel no need to read his posts candidly.

 

[MichaelWinicki]

What is it? I was banned for making a jovial reference to BZ. I was told to put him on ignore. I HAVE put him on ignore. I feel no need to read his posts candidly.

I know you were Nors... I shouldn't have suggested otherwise. My fault. I was thinking that maybe you and BZ could live in peace at some level but that is obviously not going to happen.

 

[Nors]

Gotta disagree with you on that one. They both should put each other on ignore. It would be wise for both to do this.

I agree - ignore it is

 

[Nors]

This springs to mind....and this thread would seem to be the opposite of these words...



http://cowboyszone.com/forums/showthread.php?t=25526
lighten up - this is a fun thread - I go to dinner and return - holy mackarel 100 posts! I'm here!

 

[Waffle]

Nors, I will say this about you. At least your criticism of the defense is rooted in players/schemes and doesn't always degenerate into some tiresome, endless tirade against Mike Zimmer.

 

[Nors]

Maybe you could convince him how bad he loses. I've tried. He doesn't get it.

You are an aging Marvin Hagler.

Never saw Ray Leonard outpointing you. Doth protest and believed too much in your greatness.

You are not wooly white perfect like you portray yourself.

 

[Nors]

I was wrong on that - but it was a Ware/Merriman debate. Same 3-4 player and its not written in stone yet who will be the better Pro.

I root for ware now

 

[dargonking999]

Nors, I will say this about you. At least your criticism of the defense is rooted in players/schemes and doesn't always degenerate into some tiresome, endless tirade against Mike Zimmer.

Yea sometimes i miss the post of Zimmer sucks, and threads blaming everything on Zimmer, o wait now that i think about it, it actaully makes the threads desirable.

 

[Nors]

Nors, I will say this about you. At least your criticism of the defense is rooted in players/schemes and doesn't always degenerate into some tiresome, endless tirade against Mike Zimmer.

I have gone to extremes on Zimmer - over the years given him slack. He's on a chair, rope around neck.

I'm ready to kick it out on him this year. I sense Parcells feels the same.

 

[Waffle]

I have gone to extremes on Zimmer - over the years given him slack. He's on a chair, rope around neck.

I'm ready to kick it out on him this year. I sense Parcells feels the same.

You don't think Parcells really wants to KILL him, do you?? :chop:

 

[SuspectCorner]

Lets air them here - keep the bashing centralized!

*Carter to start over Hutch - Nors correct
*Glenn to be a stud project - Check
*Going into 2004 we would play both 4-3 and 3-4 - Check
*Ty Law trade on the table - Pats a #1, Dallas offered #2 - check
I was wrong in that we did not trade for Law
*We would sign George to be Jones backup - check
*Predicted Key for Galloway trade - check
*Predicted a no risk signing for depth - Eaton - check
*Was never happy with thought of VT starting - check
*Predicted RCB implosion without Law trade - check
*Mid season called out fiasco/bust in Gurode and Right side of line - check - funny but there was some initial contesting of that one. misread stats - flamed out
*Correctly predicted Romo would beat out Henson to start season as backup
*Shanle as a player (took Singletons job late in season)
*In Januray told you Bledsoe being shopped - a Cowboy to be - check
*Predicted 3-4 Move in spite of Ellis, Glover, Howard, small LB factions
*Predicted major 3-4 draft - check
Merriman over Ware, and Spears were my 3 favorite targets round 1
*Scoffed at the Howard trade - nothing ever there - check ++++
*Was never pro Lee at RB - check
*Thomas Davis at 20 a thought - he went top 15, Miller at #42, he went first round.....

Funny how I'm "perceived" as ALWAYS WRONG! Bring it - post my misses and I'll address or admit ills of merit!

congrats for hitting on all these predictions. but i'm one of those that isn't really keeping score on how you do in that department. and don't really care whether your predictions are "dead on" or crash like a concrete glider.

i enjoy them because they are entertaining - and made even more so by your staunch defense of them.

there are very few things one can count on in life.

death...

taxes...

hollywood and wolverine bashing zimmer....

blind zebra baiting nors...

and nors wishing dallas to emulate all things new england patriots.

thanks for the consistency.

 

[Nors]

You don't think Parcells really wants to KILL him, do you?? :chop:

NOT KILL HIM, BUT CAREER WISE IN DALLAS HE'S GOT THE ROPE - ZIMMER. Lets see what he does with it.