Davidlee1973
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 1,410
- Reaction score
- 1,157
Oh so you expected to be 3-2 and getting run off the field by the cards and 49ers. So you think that’s alright.3-2 is what I expected.
We'll be 5-2 when we play the Iggles.
Oh so you expected to be 3-2 and getting run off the field by the cards and 49ers. So you think that’s alright.3-2 is what I expected.
We'll be 5-2 when we play the Iggles.
I said that in 2017.I said after the Arizona game that Dak isn’t the answer. This game confirmed it. Tonight could be the beginning of the end for him.
People can’t even beat the niners but beating them coming back from 17? Bad picks yes but game was overpoint being?
Other teams come back from being down 17 points, but Dak precedes to throw not 1, not 2, but 3 picks to ensure the blowout is complete.
MM could salvage His season with a change at QB . . . Stick a Fork on Dak
So using the last pick of the 7th round on a QB = "looking."Sure they were. They had guys, they understood they probably weren't the right guy so they were continuously looking.
LOL, what aren't you understanding here?So what?
That doesn't get them anywhere.
They should be trying to move away from Dak not give him more money.
.
It's really easy to spend someone else's money.
The 49ers were willing to throw away Lance, who they used up multiple 1st round picks forSo using the last pick of the 7th round on a QB = "looking."
But trading a 4th-round pick for a QB does NOT = "looking."
Got it.
HahahahahahahahaaThe 49ers were willing to throw away Lance, who they used up multiple 1st round picks for
The 49ers know how to evaluate QB talent and cut losses when they need to.
It's the NFL anything is possible every week. You should be laughing at your lack of football knowledge, goober. You sound like you started watching football last week.
If you have receivers running wild, so could any of us.Hurts can throw a really good ball.
Oh, please stop posting false argument.LOL, what aren't you understanding here?
We need to pay someone. You keep talking about "it's not my money" yet every reply is about saving that money which isn't yours.
Which is it?
We're not actively trying to lose football games yet. Is that your strategy? Because that's the only reason one would rather play Cooper Rush.
1) AgreedHahahahahahahahaa
Just lying or totally ignorant at this point.
1) They saw Brock Purdy light up the league BEFORE making any decision on Lance, not after.
2) They wanted to keep Lance around as the #3 QB (after he lost the backup QB battle to Darnold), and that's when LANCE REQUESTED A TRADE.
They didn't "throw him away", he wanted out.
Reply with more lies.
The bold part is still funny.1) Agreed
2) Good job for correcting me, no need to get your panties in a bunch.
The 49ers know how to evaluate QB talent
All you have to do is make the tournament. . . The identity of this team is the defense and they have all the weapons on offense to secure wins. A change at QB would right the shipFinish with a better record? Maybe. Salvage? No. Best case is say 10 or 11 wins and a wild card, still miles short of the SB.
This thread would be better with some video clips.
We all want an upgrade at QB. We all want an elite QB.
I just don't know how we get that done.
A good leader? Horse crap! He screws up then go sits by himself and stares into space, does not even try to motivate his squad. Yeah, he's a great leader all right!That's fine but keep in mind what a good LEADER he is.
Lol. You just like playing devil’s advocate.We've been looking.
We traded for a former #3 overall pick.
Were the 49ers "looking" when they found Purdy? Or did they just get lucky that their top 2 QBs got hurt last year?