CIWhitefish
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 1,024
- Reaction score
- 377
I think the only 'name' free agent we may sign would be Matt Stover and that is only if Buehler can't consistently hit FGs.
Hostile;3265052 said:You are missing the words BIG NAME in front of the words FREE AGENT. I don't mind if we sign Free Agents to fill gaps. I don't want big name guys who think they are the difference.
I am going to post this on a Commanders forum. They eat this logic up. It gives them little fits of peeing their pants in glee.cowboyjoe;3265085 said:Yes and No to a BIG NAME! Wasnt charles haley a big name, or wasnt herb adderly a big name?
I dont care who the player is, as long as he has played in a big nfc or afc championship game and got to the superbowl and won, or like brooking did even though he lost in the superbowl. But a player that wants to win before he retires and wants to be the best etc.
Again, it can be an OG, or OT, or punt/kickoff returner, but a player with class, heart, integrity, honor, values and wants to win no matter what. Hopefully that player can be on offense to ignite our players on offense like brooking ignited the players on defense and held them accountable. Another example of such a player but on defense is everson walls, who was a pretty good player i think you will agree with for the cowboys, he went to the giants his last few years and won a superbowl with the giants helping them on defense.
Hostile;3265102 said:I am going to post this on a Commanders forum. They eat this logic up. It gives them little fits of peeing their pants in glee.
I do not want BIG NAME free agents any more.daschoo;3265105 said:its happy mediums surely? obviously you can't build a team around free agency but if a player is available in a position of need then why would you not take them just because they're a free agent?
TheSport78;3264865 said:Because Dallas has certain restrictions on who and how many players we can sign in free agency, we have an opportunity to sign one player with a .......
NO G Jahri Evans- Here's my pick. He's actually a very solid player. Having Kosier as the backup, swing guard isn't a bad situation at all. Having Evans would allow us to trade and release Colombo, keep Flozell for another year or two, move Free to RT and draft an OT in the 1st round to eventually replace Flozell. Even Free could move to LT eventually and if our 1st round OT doesn't pan out at LT, we can always move him to RT.
......
Hostile;3265109 said:I do not want BIG NAME free agents any more.
Last year we had people clamoring for Ray Lewis. We got Keith Brooking for a song in comparison to the money Ray wanted.
I don't mind adding Free Agents, but the big name guys never make a difference. Tell me who is the big name Free Agent that the Colts signed this off season? Who is the Saints version? Who did Pittsburgh sign last year? Who did the Cardinals sign last year? What about the Patriots the year before? Or the Giants?
Every year the Commanders sign the biggest Free Agent on the market or at least top 5. 4-12 in 2009. How is that practice looking?
Where did signing TO get us in the long run? He felt he was more important than the whole team. He was the missing piece.
I am not in favor of big name guys. It is just that simple.
I'll stand on what I said above. Thank you for your clarification.TheSport78;3265114 said:I did not say big NAME free agent once. I just said BIG free agent, which meant they would have a salary of $5.5 million or more and would make a solid impact on the team. The most impact we can make on this team is OL, S, WR, or K.
iceberg;3265112 said:why on earth would i want us to trade or release colombo?
CIWhitefish;3265057 said:I think the only 'name' free agent we may sign would be Matt Stover and that is only if Buehler can't consistently hit FGs.
Hostile;3265116 said:I'll stand on what I said above. Thank you for your clarification.
NextGenBoys;3264866 said:To be honest, I dont think we're going to have a BIG free agent signing.
It's just my opinion, but I think those who believe we ARE going to get one are going to be disappointed.
We don't need one either. We need a solid draft, and we're going to be looking pretty good.
We get a draft like 08 again, and we're in strong contention for a Super Bowl for the next five years.
TheSport78;3265117 said:Because we need to get younger on the OL. If we go into the 2010 season with Flozell and Colombo as our OT's, we should expect another early exit from the playoffs.
NextGenBoys;3264866 said:To be honest, I dont think we're going to have a BIG free agent signing.
It's just my opinion, but I think those who believe we ARE going to get one are going to be disappointed.
We don't need one either. We need a solid draft, and we're going to be looking pretty good.
We get a draft like 08 again, and we're in strong contention for a Super Bowl for the next five years.
iceberg;3265153 said:i swear i'll never get why some people get hung up on #'s and so forth.
colombo is damn good and no reason to rush him out the door cause you wanna rush in someone who's biggest attribute so far is you get to "go shopping" for somone.