iceberg
rock music matters
- Messages
- 34,404
- Reaction score
- 7,932
i don't know why people are using this to bash the front office decisions....what this really shows is yet another example of the need for teams to be able to recoup more $$ from players when they string out these sort of things. Orton was basically telling the team all summer he wasn't sure if he was gonna play, maybe would retire, didn't show up to any of the offseason work. So the Cowboys are forced to question his commitment and they let him go. in that scenario they should be able to recoup all the money to the cap instead of just a percentage.
it just reminds you of the Ratliff situation although that one was FAR worse and should have resulted in more $$ being given back to the team
but i don't fault the front office at all...we can't look back at every decision with hindsight and say shame on the FO. i would have cut him long before they did when the continued stalling was going on
because they're frustrated at losing for so many years. to a point it's understandable. after awhile, it's just annoying.