Owens back. Yes or No?

otero1;1244199 said:
You are a manic depressive man. :rolleyes:

Man that is one hell of a Sig picture you got there.

I wish someone would make one of Vick getting stiff armed by Ware.
 
I say no.

But we MUST go out and get a replacement immediately.
 
mickgreen58;1244203 said:
Man that is one hell of a Sig picture you got there.

I wish someone would make one of Vick getting stiff armed by Ware.
LOL Thanks! Hmm good idea.. I should make one.
 
Clove;1244210 said:
I say no.

But we MUST go out and get a replacement immediately.
If we can find someone to replace Terrell, we would certainly do it. The problem is, who can replace Terrell?
 
Owens back or not? Pshh
What in the world are wrong with these numbers?
In 15 games
1040 rec. yds.
11 TDs
13.5 yards a catch avg.
 
otero1;1244226 said:
Owens back or not? Pshh
What in the world are wrong with these numbers?
In 15 games
1040 rec. yds.
11 TDs
13.5 yards a catch avg.

Yeah and that is with two different QB, new team, new system, injuries, drops...

I think we are watching this offense sync up
 
otero1;1244226 said:
Owens back or not? Pshh
What in the world are wrong with these numbers?
In 15 games
1040 rec. yds.
11 TDs
13.5 yards a catch avg.

The most impressive part of this is how he's played a whole game more than anyone else in the league. If that's not dedication, I don't know what is.
 
jimnabby;1244278 said:
The most impressive part of this is how he's played a whole game more than anyone else in the league. If that's not dedication, I don't know what is.


LOL... who did he play for during the bye?
 
The guy us just so talented, but the antics are only going to get worse. So you have to make a choice. Can I get a player in here that is talented, not TO talent, but talented enough to move this train down the track?

If you can get that guy in here, then we will be okay. The bigger issue first is, will BP be back. This will determine alot about the TO situation.
 
TO back? Not only no but hell no...as Bum once said..."I wouldn't give a hot six pack for him..."
 
Hi folks!,

He should be back, he's a nice playmaker and I like his intensity to play. Parcells knows how to handle him and the team seems to like him.
 
Of course i want him back, the worst thing he has done is the recent spitting incident, which i dont care about because its Hall and i know what he dose. Anyone he says diff. is just listening way to much to ESPN and other media outlets.
 
nc1054;1244298 said:
TO back? Not only no but hell no...as Bum once said..."I wouldn't give a hot six pack for him..."
Owens back?!?

No, no a thousand times NO!!!
 
I'm not ready to swiftly fall back to mediocrity again.

cut.. no
back.. well, of course.

I'll take the occasional media circus to get what is provided to this team every week. It's really no different to me than when we had the Playmaker here.
 
Clove;1244210 said:
I say no.

But we MUST go out and get a replacement immediately.

Who FredEx. No one leaves a superstar #1 receiver unattended during FA. Drafting one could set you team back 2 years if you get a Larry Fitzgerald god knows how long if you end up with 1st rounders like Atlanta, and Detroit drafted.
 
LaTunaNostra;1245103 said:
Our Playmaker is Tony.

It's he who will stave off mediocrity.

oh cmon now LTN. You and I just talked yesterday in a thread about how much TG and TO need each other. We talked about the dynamics of having two 1000 yard receivers. Have you forgotten that discussion? As much as you hated to you admitted this fact. Well, not really fact but strong opinion.
 
He will be back the only lingering question I have is the hand, they say the surgery may not fix everything. I am nuetral on TO hate him as person and probably would spit on him in the street but he is a hell of a player that brings on sunday unlike that cad so many here wanted us to draft instead of ellis.
 

Staff online

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
465,200
Messages
13,858,073
Members
23,788
Latest member
mattyice
Back
Top